Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Analysis of DNA Double-strand Break DSB Repair in Mammalian Cells
Published on: September 8, 2010
A limited number of double-strand DNA breaks is sufficient to delay cell cycle progression
Jeroen van den Berg1, Anna G Manjón1, Karoline Kielbassa1
1Oncode Institute, Division of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
DNA damaging agents cause a variety of lesions, of which DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most genotoxic. Unbiased approaches aimed at investigating the relationship between the number of DSBs and outcome of the DNA damage response have been challenging due to the random nature in which damage is induced by classical DNA damaging agents. Here, we describe a CRISPR/Cas9-based system that permits us to efficiently introduce DSBs at defined sites in the genome. Using this system, we show that a guide RNA targeting only a single site in the human genome can trigger a checkpoint response that is potent enough to delay cell cycle progression. Abrogation of this checkpoint leads to DNA breaks in mitosis which gives rise to aneuploid progeny.
Insights
This study introduces a CRISPR/Cas9 system to precisely induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Targeting a single site with this system triggers a cell cycle delay, and its abrogation causes mitotic DNA breaks and aneuploidy.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly genotoxic DNA lesions.
- Investigating the link between DSB numbers and DNA damage response outcomes is difficult due to random damage induction.
- Classical DNA damaging agents induce DSBs randomly, complicating outcome analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a precise method for inducing DSBs at specific genomic locations.
- To investigate the cellular response to a defined number of DSBs.
- To understand the consequences of abrogating the DNA damage checkpoint.
Main Methods:
- CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system.
- Targeting a single specific site in the human genome with a guide RNA.
- Cell cycle progression analysis.
- Mitotic DNA break assessment.
- Aneuploidy analysis.
Main Results:
- A CRISPR/Cas9 system efficiently introduces DSBs at defined genomic sites.
- A single DSB is sufficient to trigger a potent cell cycle checkpoint response.
- Abrogation of this checkpoint leads to DNA breaks during mitosis.
- Mitotic DNA breaks result in aneuploid daughter cells.
Conclusions:
- CRISPR/Cas9 enables precise control over DSB induction for studying DNA damage response.
- Even a single DSB can activate significant cell cycle checkpoints.
- Checkpoint failure allows for mitotic DNA breaks, leading to genomic instability (aneuploidy).
Related Concept Videos
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Lagging Strand Synthesis
There are several major differences between synthesis of the leading strand and synthesis of the lagging strand. 1) Leading strand synthesis happens in the direction of replication fork opening, whereas lagging strand synthesis happens in the...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Topoisomerases
Types and Mechanism of action
Topoisomerases are divided into two main types. ...

