Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
Published on: August 2, 2016
Fast and slow errors: Logistic regression to identify patterns in accuracy-response time relationships.
Leendert van Maanen1, Dimitris Katsimpokis2, A Dilene van Campen2,3
1Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15906, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands. l.vanmaanen@uva.nl.
This study introduces a new method for analyzing cognitive performance, using logistic regression to create conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). This approach improves upon traditional methods for understanding response time and accuracy patterns.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psychometrics
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Background:
- Understanding cognitive performance relies on analyzing error and response time (RT) patterns.
- Distributional analyses, like conditional accuracy functions (CAFs), offer deeper insights than mean statistics.
- Existing CAF methods face issues with averaging accuracy within RT bins, potentially obscuring true patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a novel method for analyzing accuracy-RT relationships using nonlinear logistic regression.
- To address the limitations of traditional RT binning in CAF computation.
- To demonstrate the utility of this new method in describing common behavioral patterns.
Main Methods:
- Developed a nonlinear logistic regression model for CAF analysis.
- Evaluated the parametric robustness of the logistic regression CAF via parameter recovery.
- Applied the novel CAF method to three existing datasets.
Main Results:
- The logistic regression CAF effectively handles issues related to RT binning.
- Specific parametric changes in the logistic regression CAF consistently describe known behavioral patterns.
- Demonstrated the method's ability to identify response capture, time pressure effects, and speed-accuracy trade-offs.
Conclusions:
- The proposed logistic regression approach offers a more robust and nuanced analysis of accuracy-RT relationships.
- This method provides a valuable tool for cognitive psychology research, enhancing the understanding of cognitive performance.
- Future research can explore modifications to further refine this analytical technique.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Regression Toward the Mean
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

