Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Improvement of LVEF in patients with HFrEF with coronary heart disease after revascularization-A real-world study
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Insights
Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement after revascularization were identified. Severely impaired LVEF, triple-vessel disease, and no prior myocardial infarction (MI) were associated with significant LVEF improvement.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) significantly impacts patient outcomes.
- Revascularization strategies aim to improve cardiac function in patients with HFrEF.
- Predicting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement is crucial for guiding treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictive factors for LVEF improvement following revascularization in patients with ischemic HFrEF.
- To analyze factors influencing the degree of LVEF improvement after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Main Methods:
- A real-world study of 993 patients with ischemic HFrEF who underwent revascularization.
- Patients were categorized based on LVEF change post-revascularization (≥10% improvement vs. <10% improvement or deterioration).
- Cox regression and multivariate generalized estimation analyses were employed to identify predictive factors.
Main Results:
- Four hundred fifty-four patients showed ≥10% LVEF improvement, while 539 had <10% improvement or deterioration.
- Independent predictors for ≥10% LVEF improvement included female sex, prior MI, baseline LVEF, digoxin use, loop diuretic use, and triple-vessel disease.
- Factors associated with the degree of LVEF improvement included low LVEF, short LV end-systolic diameter (LVESD), short LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), no prior MI, no hyperuricemia, clopidogrel use, and triple-vessel disease.
Conclusions:
- Revascularization method (PCI vs. CABG) did not influence LVEF improvement.
- Patients with severely impaired baseline LVEFs, triple-vessel disease, or no history of MI showed a tendency for marked LVEF improvement.
- LVESD, LVEDD, hyperuricemia, clopidogrel use, and loop diuretic use affected the degree of LVEF improvement.
Objective:
This study aimed to explore the predictive factors for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement after revascularization.
Methods:
This real-world study examined 993 patients with ischemic HFrEF who had received revascularization (PCI or CABG), had survived at least 90 days and had undergone an echocardiography review. Based on the change in the LVEF, we divided the patients into two groups.
Result:
We obtained 454 patients with ≥10% improvement and 539 with <10% improvement or deterioration. By Cox regression analysis, we obtained five independent factors for LVEF improvement, including female (P = 0.018, OR 0.726, 95% CI 0.557-0.947), prior MI (P = 0.000, OR 0.590, 95% CI 0.476-0.732), LVEF (P = 0.008, OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.943-0.991), digoxin (P = 0.027, OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.521-0.961), loop diuretic (P = 0.000, OR 1.515, 95% CI 1.208-1.901), and triple-vessel disease (P = 0.000, OR 1.462, 95% CI 1.192-1.792). By multivariate generalized estimation, we obtained seven factors associated with the degree of improvement, namely, low LVEF, short LVESD, short LVEDD, no prior MI, no hyperuricemia, clopidogrel use and triple-vessel disease.
Conclusions:
The method of revascularization (PCI vs CABG) had no effect on LVEF improvement. Patients with severely impaired baseline LVEFs, triple-vessel disease, or no history of MI tended to exhibit marked LVEF improvement (≥10%) after revascularization. In addition, LVESD, LVEDD, hyperuricemia, clopidogrel use and loop diuretic affected the degree of improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations

