Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.0K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.0K
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

496
Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
496
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.4K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.4K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Shunt Survival in Premature Infants with Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus: A Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Study.

The Journal of pediatrics·2026
Same author

Assessing Hospital Surgical Quality.

Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches·2025
Same author

Effect of endoscopic third ventriculostomy on subsequent shunt failure: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study.

Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics·2025
Same author

Validation of fourth ventricle roof angle as a measure of brainstem dysfunction in pediatric Chiari malformation type I.

Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics·2025
Same author

Grading Hospitals Using Multivariate Matching.

Medical care·2025
Same author

Characterizing the Venous Anatomy of Craniopagus Twins.

Neurosurgery·2025
Same journal

Microsurgical Evacuation Efficacy and Functional Outcomes in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage by Type of Antithrombotic Therapy.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same journal

Neurosurgeons Are Essential in the Interdisciplinary Care of Patients With Brain Metastasis.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same journal

Performance of Risk Scores in Predicting Intracranial Aneurysm Instability.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same journal

Electric-Scooters: An Emerging Source of High-Severity Pediatric Head Trauma.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same journal

Survival After Surgery for Spinal Osteosarcoma and the Role of Chemotherapy and Treatment Sequencing: A National Cohort Multivariable Analysis.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same journal

Safety and Efficacy of 3-Month Versus 6-Month Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Pipeline Embolization Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Neurosurgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

32.7K

Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score in Children: A Validity Study.

Ross L Dawkins1, Joseph H Miller2, Sarah T Menacho3

  • 1Section of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's of Alabama, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Neurosurgery
|September 7, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) effectively guides surgical decisions for pediatric thoracolumbar fractures. This validated tool accurately predicts appropriate treatment, improving outcomes for young patients with spinal injuries.

Keywords:
ChildrenFractureScoreThoracolumbarValidity

More Related Videos

Severe Burn Injury in a Swine Model for Clinical Dressing Assessment
07:45

Severe Burn Injury in a Swine Model for Clinical Dressing Assessment

Published on: November 6, 2018

10.2K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Pathway Linking Obesity to Autoimmune Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis
08:17

Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Pathway Linking Obesity to Autoimmune Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: February 23, 2024

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

32.7K
Severe Burn Injury in a Swine Model for Clinical Dressing Assessment
07:45

Severe Burn Injury in a Swine Model for Clinical Dressing Assessment

Published on: November 6, 2018

10.2K
Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Pathway Linking Obesity to Autoimmune Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis
08:17

Author Spotlight: Unveiling the Pathway Linking Obesity to Autoimmune Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: February 23, 2024

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Traumatology
  • Spinal Injury Assessment

Background:

  • The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) is established for adult surgical decision-making in thoracolumbar injuries.
  • Limited data exists on the TLICS system's applicability and validity in pediatric populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of the TLICS system in pediatric thoracolumbar fractures.
  • To determine if TLICS scores correlate with treatment decisions in children.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of pediatric patients with acute, traumatic thoracolumbar fractures at Level 1 trauma centers.
  • Calculation of TLICS scores using imaging (CT, MRI) and neurological assessments.
  • Comparison of TLICS scores with actual treatment received, analyzed via ROC curve analysis.

Main Results:

  • 165 pediatric patients were analyzed, with a mean TLICS score of 2.9.
  • Surgery was indicated for 23% of patients.
  • A statistically significant agreement (P < 0.001) was found between TLICS-suggested and actual treatment, with an ROC AUC of 0.96 (P < 0.001), indicating excellent discriminative ability.

Conclusions:

  • The TLICS system demonstrates strong validity in guiding treatment selection for pediatric thoracolumbar fractures.
  • The findings support the use of TLICS as a reliable tool for managing spinal injuries in children.