Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Early Versus Standard Discharge After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rafail A Kotronias1, Michael Teitelbaum2, John G Webb3
1Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute for Applied Clinical Science and Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom; Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Objectives:
This study sought to assess the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with early discharge (ED) versus standard discharge (SD) pathways.
Background:
Minimalist approaches for TAVR have been developed targeting different aspects of the procedure such as local anesthesia or sedation, intraprocedural imaging, vascular access, post-operative monitoring and care, and discharge planning. Their incorporation into routine clinical practice aims to reduce length of hospital stay and health care cost utilization without adversely affecting outcomes when compared with standard approaches.
Methods:
The authors conducted a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies that investigated ED (≤3 days) versus SD in TAVR patients. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the effect of ED compared with SD with regard to 30-day mortality after discharge, 30-day readmission rate, and need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following discharge.
Results:
Eight studies including 1,775 participants (ED, n = 642) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 82.4 years and STS score was 6.7. Meta-analyses evaluating discharge to 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23 to 1.82; I2 = 0%) and discharge to 30-day new PPI (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 0.19 to 13.71; I2 = 40%) showed no significant difference in an ED compared with a SD strategy. Notably, ED patients were less likely to be readmitted after ED when compared with SD patients (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.98; p = 0.04, I2 = 0%).
Conclusions:
ED following uncomplicated TAVR is safe in terms of discharge to 30-day mortality or need for PPI following discharge. Moreover, ED patients experienced a lower rate of readmissions. These data support the safety of programs aiming an ED pathway in selected TAVR patients. Institutional protocols with the input from different members of the multidisciplinary heart team should be devised to optimize discharge processes to improve health care resource utilization.
More Related Videos
09:57Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
07:46Author Spotlight: Revolutionizing Remote Surgery with Augmented Reality and Robotics for Enhanced Precision and Accessibility
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Discharge Summary Forms
Here's a detailed look at the key components and guidelines for preparing a discharge summary:
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
RC Circuits: Discharging A Capacitor
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Random and Systematic Errors