Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Complications related to the insertion and maintenance of peripheral venous access central venous catheter
M E Lacostena-Pérez1, A M Buesa-Escar1, A M Gil-Alós1
1Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital General San Jorge, Huesca, España.
Insights
Peripheral intravenous catheters (PICCs) are effective for central venous access, with a low incidence of complications. This study evaluated PICC complications, finding infection and phlebitis as key concerns, particularly in non-ICU settings.
Area of Science:
- Medical Devices
- Vascular Access
- Infection Control
Background:
- Central venous catheters are crucial for patient care.
- Peripheral intravenous catheters (PICCs) offer an alternative for central venous access.
- Evaluating PICC-related complications is essential for patient safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the rates and types of complications associated with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs).
- To analyze factors influencing PICC complications.
- To compare complication rates between Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational study.
- Included patients over 14 years old with PICC insertion between May 2015 and April 2016.
- Collected data on demographics, insertion, maintenance, dwell time, complications, and infections.
Main Results:
- 144 PICCs were inserted; 94 in ICU (65.28%) and 50 in non-ICU (34.72%).
- Suspected infection rate was 17.36% (15.2/1000 PICC days); confirmed infection rate was 6.25% (5.5/1000 PICC days).
- Phlebitis incidence was 9.03% (7.9/1000 PICC days); 5 bacteraemias occurred, all in the non-ICU group.
Conclusions:
- PICCs are effective for central venous access with minimal implantation risks.
- PICC advantages over classic central venous catheters are notable.
- PICC insertion and management represent an advanced nursing technique.
Objective:
To evaluate the rates and nature of the complications related to the Central Peripheral Access Catheter (CVCAP or PICC) from its insertion to its withdrawal.
Methods:
Prospective observational study. All patients older than 14 years of age with a PICC inserted in the polyvalent intensive care unit (ICU) during the period between May 1, 2015 and April 30, 2016 were included. Data collected included: demographic data, insertion details, reason for insertion and removal, maintenance unit, total dwell time, incidence of complications and related factors and infection rate.
Results:
144 PICCs were inserted, of which 94 corresponded to the ICU group (65.28%) and 50 (34.72%) to the non-ICU group. The most important complication was the suspicion of infection: 17.36% (rate of 15.2 per 1000 days of PICC). The total number of confirmed infections was 6.25% (5.5 per 1000 days of PICC), 1.39% (1.2 per 1000 days) being in the ICU group and 4.86% (4.2 per 1000 days) in the non-ICU group. There were 5 bacteraemias, all in the non-ICU group (3 per 1000 days). The most frequent germ was Staphylococcus epidermidis (6 cases). Phlebitis had an incidence of 9.03% (7.9 per 1000 days of PICC).
Conclusions:
PICC, effective device for central venous access due to the minimal incidence of risks in implantation and to its advantages with regard to the classic central venous catheters, is a further nursing technique.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Return
What is Venous Return?
Venous return refers to the rate at which blood flows back to the heart from the body's peripheral veins. It's an integral part of the circulatory system...
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...

