Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Predicting Molecular Geometry

Predicting Molecular Geometry

VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).

Molecular Orbital Theory II

Molecular Orbital Theory II

Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

In 1866, Gregor Mendel published the results of his pea plant breeding experiments, providing evidence for predictable patterns in the inheritance of physical characteristics. The significance of his findings was not immediately recognized. In fact, the existence of genes was unknown at the time. Mendel referred to hereditary units as “factors.”

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A blended genome and exome sequencing method captures genetic variation in an unbiased and cost-effective manner.

Nature genetics·2026

Same author

Years of life lost in patients with a false-negative diagnosis of primary melanoma. A prospective study of the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry involving 9063 patients over 28 years.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Automated Deep Learning-Based Demyelination Load Segmentation in Metachromatic Leukodystrophy.

Clinical neuroradiology·2026

Same author

Genome-wide association study of major anxiety disorders in 122,341 European-ancestry cases identifies 58 loci and highlights GABAergic signaling.

Nature genetics·2026

Same author

Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Systematic Literature Review.

International journal of neonatal screening·2025

Same author

Global multi-ancestry genetic study elucidates genes and biological pathways associated with thyroid cancer and benign thyroid diseases.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

Predicting melanoma risk: theory, practice and future challenges.

David Whiteman¹

¹Cancer Control Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, PO Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Melanoma Management

|September 8, 2018

Summary

Melanoma incidence is rising, necessitating accurate risk prediction. Current tools need better validation to identify high-risk patients for early intervention and improved survival.

Keywords:

cancer control early detection melanoma prevention risk factors risk prediction risk stratification

More Related Videos

A Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model

A Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model

Published on: May 20, 2019

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis

Published on: March 8, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors

Published on: February 16, 2024

A Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model

A Melanoma Patient-Derived Xenograft Model

Published on: May 20, 2019

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis

A Robust Discovery Platform for the Identification of Novel Mediators of Melanoma Metastasis

Published on: March 8, 2022

Area of Science:

Dermatology
Oncology
Epidemiology

Background:

Melanoma incidence is increasing globally, particularly in fair-skinned populations.
Early detection and risk stratification are crucial for improving patient survival rates.
Existing risk prediction models often lack rigorous validation and clinical utility.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the performance and clinical utility of melanoma risk prediction tools.
To identify accurate methods for stratifying patients based on melanoma risk.
To guide future research in melanoma risk assessment.

Main Methods:

Review of existing melanoma risk prediction tools.
Assessment of tool performance metrics including calibration and discrimination.
Evaluation of validation studies in independent populations.

Main Results:

Few developed melanoma risk prediction tools have undergone rigorous performance evaluation.
Limited validation of existing tools in independent populations hinders clinical adoption.
There is a need for improved methods to accurately identify high-risk individuals.

Conclusions:

Current melanoma risk prediction tools require further validation to ensure clinical utility.
Integrating genomic data may enhance the accuracy of future risk prediction models.
Accurate identification of high-risk individuals is essential for effective melanoma prevention and early intervention.