Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
Published on: December 7, 2018
Evaluation of Two Types of Drug Treatment with QEEG in Children with ADHD
Ramazan Aldemir1, Esra Demirci2, Ayşe Kaçar Bayram3
1Biomedical Device Technology Program, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Insights
Methylphenidate and atomoxetine treatments showed similar effects on electroencephalography (EEG) signals in children with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Atomoxetine demonstrated more significant quantitative EEG changes in frontal regions compared to methylphenidate.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Pediatric Psychiatry
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children.
- Pharmacological interventions, including methylphenidate and atomoxetine, are primary treatments for ADHD.
- Electroencephalography (EEG) and Quantitative EEG (QEEG) offer insights into brain activity and treatment effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on EEG signals in children with ADHD.
- To compare the QEEG changes induced by these two ADHD medications.
- To explore the potential of QEEG in supporting ADHD diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Forty children (7-17 years) were divided into an ADHD group (n=20) and a control group (n=20).
- The ADHD group was further split into methylphenidate (MPH) and atomoxetine (ATX) treatment subgroups (n=10 each).
- EEG data were recorded before and after 3 months of treatment, analyzing power spectrum densities in delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands.
Main Results:
- Both methylphenidate and atomoxetine treatments yielded similar findings across EEG power spectrum densities (delta, theta, alpha, beta bands).
- Statistically significant EEG amplitude variations were observed, primarily in the frontal and temporal regions for both medications.
- No significant differences in overall EEG power spectrum densities were noted between MPH and ATX treatments.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative EEG (QEEG) rates at frontal electrodes showed statistically greater significance after atomoxetine treatment compared to methylphenidate.
- This suggests potential differential effects of atomoxetine on frontal brain activity in ADHD.
- The study highlights QEEG's potential role in assessing treatment response and possibly correlating with ADHD severity.
Aims:
The aim of this study is to evalute the effects of methylphenidate and atomoxetine treatments on electroencephalography (EEG) signals in volunteer children diagnosed with Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder(ADHD).
Methods:
The study contained 40 children all of whom were between the ages of 7 and 17. The participants were classified into two groups as ADHD (n=20), which was in itself divided into two groups as ADHD-MPH (ADHD- Metylphenidate treatment) (n=10) and as ADHD-ATX (ADHD-Atomoxetin treatment) (n=10), and one control group (n=20). Following the first EEG recordings of the ADHD group, long-acting methylphenidate dose was applied to one ADHD group and atomoxetine dose was applied to the other ADHD group. The effect of optimal dosage is about for 4-6 weeks in general. Therefore, the response or lack of response to the treatment was evaluated three months after the beginning of the treatment.After methylphenidate and atomoxetine drug treatment, in order to obtain mean and maximum power values for delta, theta, alpha and beta band, the EEG data were analyzed.
Results:
The EEG power spectrum densities in all the bands yielded similar findings in both methylphenidate and atomoxetine. Although statistically significant frequency values of the electrodes were amplitude and maximally varied, in general, they appeared mostly at both frontal and temporal regions for methylphenidate and atomoxetine.
Conclusion:
Especially, after atomoxetine treatment, Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) rates at frontal area electrodes were found statistically more significant than methylphenidate QEEG rates. What has been researched in this study is not only whether QEEG is likely to support the diagnosis, but whether changes on QEEG by treatment may be related to the severity of ADHD as well.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids

