Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Nasolacrimal Lavage as a Treatment for Ocular Surface Toxic Soup Syndrome
Published on: April 25, 2025
Is bone marrow examination in small-cell lung cancer really necessary?
Abstract:
Of 403 patients with small-cell lung cancer, we identified by aspiration, biopsy, or both 67 with bone marrow involvement and found the two procedures to be complementary in detecting marrow involvement. The mean surface area of the positive biopsy specimens was significantly greater than that of a randomly selected group of negative biopsy specimens, suggesting that the larger the specimen, the greater the chance of detecting tumour. Patients with marrow involvement had only a slightly worse prognosis compared with other patients who had extensive disease. Only 7 of the 403 patients (1.7%) had extensive disease based on marrow involvement alone. Because bone marrow examination rarely changes the stage of cancer in noninvasively assessed patients, and has no impact on the tolerance of chemotherapy and only a small effect on length of survival, we do not recommend this procedure in the routine staging of small-cell lung cancer.
Related Concept Videos
05:12Murine Nasal Lavage Fluid Collection without Blood Contamination
03:40Nasolacrimal Lavage as a Treatment for Ocular Surface Toxic Soup Syndrome
04:35Saline Lavage for Sampling of the Canine Nasal Immune Microenvironment
08:47Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
06:49Reduced Itraconazole Concentration and Durations Are Successful in Treating Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis Infection in Amphibians
07:15Intranasal Administration of CNS Therapeutics to Awake Mice

