Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction vs. endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine
Jianmei Pan1, Xiaohua Zhang2, Yongjun Shi2
1a Department of Gastroenterology , Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University , Jinan , China.
Objective:
There are no guidelines or consensus on the optimal treatment measures for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) at present. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with suction and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the small rectal NETs.
Methods:
The literature searches were conducted using Pubmed and Embase databases, and then a meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was complete resection rate, and the secondary outcomes were complication rate, procedure time, and recurrence rate.
Results:
Fourteen studies with 823 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The overall complete resection rates in EMR with suction and ESD procedure were 93.65% (472/504) and 84.08% (243/289), respectively. The pooled analysis showed that EMR with suction could achieve a higher complete resection rate than ESD with significance (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.42-6.88, p < .00001) when the outlier study was excluded, and procedure time was significantly shorter in the EMR with suction group than in the ESD group (SMD: -1.59, 95% CI: -2.27 to -0.90, p < .00001). Moreover, there was no significant difference in overall complication rate (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.28-1.14, p = .11) and overall recurrence rate (OR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.11-5.07, I2=48%) between EMR with suction and ESD group.
Conclusions:
The present meta-analysis mostly based on retrospective studies show that EMR with suction is superior to ESD for small rectal NETs (≤10 mm) with higher complete resection rate, shorter procedure time, and similar overall complication rate and recurrence.
Insights
Endoscopic mucosal resection with suction is more effective than endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This method offers a higher complete resection rate and shorter procedure time with similar safety outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Surgical Oncology
- Endoscopic Surgery
Background:
- Small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) lack established optimal treatment guidelines.
- Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with suction and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are potential treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of EMR with suction versus ESD for small rectal NETs.
- To evaluate complete resection rates, complication rates, procedure times, and recurrence rates.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of 14 studies involving 823 patients.
- Literature search conducted using PubMed and Embase databases.
- Primary outcome: complete resection rate; Secondary outcomes: complication, procedure time, and recurrence rates.
Main Results:
- EMR with suction achieved a higher complete resection rate (93.65%) compared to ESD (84.08%).
- EMR with suction demonstrated significantly shorter procedure times.
- No significant differences were observed in overall complication or recurrence rates between the two methods.
Conclusions:
- EMR with suction is superior to ESD for treating small rectal NETs (≤10 mm).
- EMR with suction offers higher complete resection rates and shorter procedure times.
- Both methods show similar safety profiles regarding complications and recurrence.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

