Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Workflow for Integrating POCUS Data into EHR for Managing Heart Failure Patients
Published on: July 12, 2024
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Patiromer and Spironolactone Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with Hyperkalemia
Mark Bounthavong1, Javed Butler2, Chantal M Dolan3
1Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, HSB H375-P, Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195-7630, USA.
Insights
For heart failure patients unable to tolerate spironolactone due to hyperkalemia, adding patiromer offers improved longevity and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a cost-effective rate, suggesting good economic value.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Cardiology
- Health Economics
Background:
- Spironolactone is crucial for heart failure (HF) management but often limited by hyperkalemia.
- Patiromer effectively manages hyperkalemia, enabling spironolactone use in intolerant patients.
- The economic value of combining patiromer with spironolactone in HF requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To model the pharmacoeconomic value of using patiromer and spironolactone in HF patients with hyperkalemia.
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of patiromer-spironolactone therapy versus standard care.
Main Methods:
- A Markov model simulated lifetime costs and outcomes for 65-year-old NYHA class III-IV HF patients.
- Data from RALES and OPAL-HK trials informed clinical inputs; literature and list prices provided cost and utility estimates.
- Cost-effectiveness was determined by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained.
Main Results:
- Patiromer-spironolactone-ACEI therapy increased life expectancy (5.29 vs. 4.62 years) and QALYs (2.79 vs. 2.60) compared to ACEI alone.
- This combination increased costs (US$28,200 vs. US$18,200) with an ICER of US$52,700 per QALY gained.
- Sensitivity analyses showed ICERs ranging from US$40,000 to US$85,800 per QALY.
Conclusions:
- Spironolactone-patiromer-ACEI therapy offers clinical benefits for HF patients intolerant to spironolactone due to hyperkalemia.
- This combination demonstrates good economic value from a payer perspective.
- Patiromer facilitates spironolactone use, improving outcomes and cost-effectiveness in specific HF populations.
Background And Objective:
Certain patients with heart failure (HF) are unable to tolerate spironolactone therapy due to hyperkalemia. Patiromer is a novel agent used to treat hyperkalemia and has been shown to be efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated. The potential clinical outcomes and economic value of using patiromer and spironolactone in patients with HF unable to otherwise tolerate spironolactone due to hyperkalemia are unclear. The objective of this analysis was to model the potential pharmacoeconomic value of using patiromer and spironolactone in patients with a history of hyperkalemia that prevents them from utilizing spironolactone.
Methods:
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with patiromer, spironolactone, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV HF compared with ACEI alone. A Markov model was constructed to simulate a cohort of 65-year-old patients diagnosed with HF from the payer perspective across the lifetime horizon. Clinical inputs were derived from the RALES and OPAL-HK randomized trials of spironolactone and patiromer, respectively. Utility estimates and costs were derived from the literature and list prices. Outcomes assessed included hospitalization, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probability sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model findings.
Results:
Treatment with patiromer-spironolactone-ACEI was projected to increase longevity compared with ACEI alone (5.29 vs. 4.62 life-years gained, respectively), greater QALYs (2.79 vs. 2.60), and costs (US$28,200 vs. US$18,200), giving an ICER of US$52,700 per QALY gained. The ICERs ranged from US$40,000 to US$85,800 per QALY gained in 1-way sensitivity analyses.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that the use of spironolactone-patiromer-ACEI may provide clinical benefit and good economic value in patients with NYHA class III-IV HF unable to tolerate spironolactone due to hyperkalemia.
More Related Videos
04:20Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
Published on: October 1, 2019
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management