Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Fabrication of a Bioactive, PCL-based "Self-fitting" Shape Memory Polymer Scaffold
Published on: October 23, 2015
Cellular Response to 3-D Printed Bioactive Silicate and Borosilicate Glass Scaffolds
Weitao Jia1, Grace Y Lau2, Wenhai Huang3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Bioactive glass scaffolds effectively support bone healing and defect bridging. Borosilicate glass demonstrated superior performance in promoting mineralization and gene expression compared to silicate glass in vitro, aligning with faster in vivo bone regeneration.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
- Orthopedic Research
Background:
- Segmental bone defects pose significant challenges in bone repair and regeneration.
- Previous studies showed bioactive glass supports bone healing without additional growth factors or cells.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive in vitro evaluation of silicate (13-93) and borosilicate (2B6Sr) bioactive glass scaffolds.
- To correlate in vitro biological performance with in vivo bone healing capabilities.
- To understand the biological mechanisms underlying bioactive glass efficacy in bone regeneration.
Main Methods:
- In vitro assessment using a murine MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell line.
- Evaluation of cell attachment, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production, mineral deposition, and osteoblast marker gene expression.
- Comparison of silicate (13-93) and borosilicate (2B6Sr) glass scaffold performance.
Main Results:
- Both silicate and borosilicate glass scaffolds supported cell attachment and VEGF formation.
- Both scaffolds stimulated mineral deposition and osteoblast marker gene expression.
- Borosilicate (2B6Sr) glass exhibited enhanced mineralization and gene expression compared to silicate (13-93) glass.
Conclusions:
- In vitro results confirm the biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of both bioactive glass types.
- Borosilicate (2B6Sr) glass shows superior in vitro biological activity, correlating with faster in vivo bone healing.
- These findings support the translational evaluation of bioactive glass scaffolds for clinical applications in bone defect repair.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular
The Looking Glass Self
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Cellular Differentiation
A zygote is a...
Cellular Respiration

