Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Modern Dual-Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Jay M Levin1, Assem A Sultan1, Jeffrey A O'Donnell1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Insights
Dual-mobility cups show excellent survivorship and low dislocation rates in revision total hip arthroplasty. These implants are a safe and effective option for high-risk patients needing hip revision surgery.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Arthroplasty Research
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) presents unique challenges, including higher risks of instability and complications.
- Dual-mobility (DM) cups have emerged as a potential solution to improve outcomes in complex THA cases.
- Assessing the efficacy of DM cups specifically in revision THA settings is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and analyze the outcomes of dual-mobility (DM) cups in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- To evaluate survivorship rates (all-cause and aseptic), dislocation rates, and overall complication profiles associated with DM cups in revision THA.
- To assess clinical outcomes using validated health status measures in patients who received DM cups during revision THA.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies on DM cups in revision THA.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting re-revision rates, complications, and clinical outcomes, specifically excluding primary THA analyses and non-modern implant data (pre-2010).
- Nine studies met the selection criteria for final meta-analysis and outcome assessment.
Main Results:
- Dual-mobility cups demonstrated high aseptic (97.7%) and all-cause (94.5%) survivorship rates in revision THA.
- The overall dislocation rate was low at 2.2%, with intraprosthetic dislocation at 0.3%. Meta-analysis confirmed significantly lower dislocation odds compared to fixed-bearing prostheses (OR 0.24, P = .002).
- Complications occurred in 7.4% of cases, with infection rates at 3.3%. Postoperative outcomes measured by Harris Hip Scores showed no statistically significant improvement (P > .05).
Conclusions:
- Dual-mobility cups exhibit excellent survivorship and low rates of dislocation and overall complications in revision total hip arthroplasty.
- The findings support DM cups as a safe and effective implant choice, particularly for high-risk patient populations undergoing revision THA.
- Further research may explore factors influencing clinical outcome scores in this patient cohort.
Background:
The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the outcomes of dual-mobility (DM) cups in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Specifically, we evaluated the following: (1) all-cause and aseptic survivorship rates; (2) dislocation rates; (3) complications; and (4) clinical outcomes reported using validated health status measures.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search included studies that reported the following: (1) re-revision rates, (2) complications, and (3) clinical outcomes following DM use in revision THA. The following exclusion criteria were used: (1) studies that did not stratify their analysis between primary and revision THA, (2) studies that utilized off-label techniques, (3) review articles, (4) case studies, (5) basic science articles, (6) non-English language reports, and (6) reports on patients who underwent surgery before 2010, in order to reflect modern DM implants use and technology. A total of 9 studies were included in our final analysis.
Results:
Aseptic and all-cause survivorship rates were 97.7% and 94.5%. Prevalence of dislocation was 2.2%, and 0.3% for intraprosthetic dislocation. Meta-analysis comparing DM to fixed-bearing prostheses demonstrated a significantly lower odds of dislocation in the DM cohort (odds ratio 0.24, P = .002). Complications occurred in 7.4% of revision THAs with DM cups, while infection rates totaled to 3.3% of cases. Studies comparing outcomes using Harris Hip Scores did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in improved postoperative scores (P > .05).
Conclusion:
DM cups have demonstrated excellent survivorship, low dislocation, and overall complication rates. Therefore, it can be considered a safe and effective option, particularly in the high-risk patients who undergo revision THA.
Related Concept Videos
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...

