Telling the truth to young children: Ethical reasons for information disclosure in paediatrics

Nicholas Hudson1,2, Merle Spriggs1,3, Lynn Gillam1,3

  • 1Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Insights

Doctors face ethical dilemmas when parents restrict information disclosure to children. This paper outlines ethical arguments for truth-telling to pediatric patients, especially pre-adolescents, regardless of decision-making capacity.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Pediatric Patient Rights
  • Informed Consent

Background:

  • Parents may request non-disclosure of medical information to their children.
  • This creates ethical challenges for physicians regarding patient disclosure.
  • Existing guidelines are unclear for pre-adolescent (immature minor) information-giving.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To map the professional and legal context of information-giving to children.
  • To identify key ethical arguments supporting disclosure to child patients.
  • To explore ethical reasons for truth-telling to pre-adolescent children.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of professional and legal landscapes.
  • Analysis of ethical arguments for information disclosure.
  • Focus on pre-adolescent children (immature minors).

Main Results:

  • Six ethical reasons for telling the truth to younger children were identified.
  • Disclosure is supported by ethical arguments independent of decision-making capacity.
  • The professional and legal landscape for pediatric information-giving is complex.

Conclusions:

  • Physicians have ethical obligations to disclose information to pediatric patients.
  • Truth-telling to children is ethically justifiable, even for pre-adolescents.
  • Ethical reasons for disclosure exist beyond the child's capacity for shared decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
25.7K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.5K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
438
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
68.9K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
67.8K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
2.9K