Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Applications of Integration to Probability Density Functions01:27

Applications of Integration to Probability Density Functions

64
Continuous probability distributions are used to model random variables that can take on any real value within a specified range. These variables do not take on isolated or countable values but rather exist on a continuum. For example, the height of an individual can be measured with increasing precision—such as 163.5 or 165.25 centimeters—demonstrating that height is a continuous random variable.The behavior of such variables is described using a probability density function (PDF),...
64
Coefficient of Variation01:10

Coefficient of Variation

8.7K
The coefficient of variation measures the dispersion of the data points or distribution around the mean. Using the coefficient of variation, we can compare two data series with drastically different means or different units of measurement. The coefficient of variation for a sample and a population is expressed as a percentage of the ratio of standard deviation to the mean.
The coefficient of variation is a practical statistical tool in finance. It allows investors to assess the volatility or...
8.7K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

8.7K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
8.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.7K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.7K
Thermodynamics: Activity Coefficient01:24

Thermodynamics: Activity Coefficient

2.9K
Activity is the measure of the effective concentration of the species in solution. It can be expressed as the product of the molar concentration of the species and its activity coefficient. The activity coefficient is a dimensionless quantity and depends on the total ionic strength of the solution.
The activity coefficient is a measure of the deviation from ideal behavior. When the ionic strength of the solution is minimal, the activity coefficient of an ionic species is close to unity, making...
2.9K
Reflection of Waves01:07

Reflection of Waves

4.6K
When a wave travels from one medium to another, it gets reflected at the boundary of the second medium. A common example of this is when a person yells at a distance from a cliff and hears the echo of their voice. The sound waves (longitudinal waves) traveling in the air are reflected from the bounding cliff. Similarly, flipping one end of a string whose other end is tied to a wall causes a pulse (transverse wave) to travel through the string, which gets reflected upon reaching the wall. In...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Application of Generative Adversarial Networks to Improve COVID-19 Classification on Ultrasound Images.

Journal of imaging·2025
Same author

Integrative physiological study of radiation-induced lung injury: effects on cardiac function and kidney integrity.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2025
Same author

Shedding Light on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Activity: A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Potential of [<sup>99m</sup>Tc]Tc-Anti-TNF-Alpha Scintigraphy.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

The Role of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Orthopedics: Where Do We Stand?

Current issues in molecular biology·2025
Same author

Paracoccidioidomycosis as a Manifestation of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in an HIV Patient: An Uncommon Presentation.

Open forum infectious diseases·2025
Same author

SHOULDER PAIN, ULTRASOUND CHANGES, AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE IN OBESE PATIENTS.

Acta ortopedica brasileira·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests
08:36

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests

Published on: November 30, 2017

10.0K

EXPLORING CORTICAL BONE DENSITY THROUGH THE ULTRASOUND INTEGRATED REFLECTION COEFFICIENT.

Daniel Patterson Matusin1, Aldo José Fontes-Pereira1, Paulo Tadeu Cardozo Ribeiro Rosa1

  • 1Biomedical Engineering Program, Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Acta Ortopedica Brasileira
|September 14, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ultrasonic reflection, measured by the Integrated Reflection Coefficient (IRC), shows sensitivity to bone density variations in bovine cortical bone samples. This supports its potential use in assessing bone health.

Keywords:
Bone and BonesBone densityCortical boneTomographyUltrasonics

More Related Videos

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
09:02

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

Published on: January 31, 2025

1.7K
Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
09:32

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

Published on: June 30, 2014

22.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests
08:36

Fragility Assessment of Bovine Cortical Bone Using Scratch Tests

Published on: November 30, 2017

10.0K
Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population
09:02

Cortical Bone Assessment Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves: A Reproducibility Study in a Healthy Population

Published on: January 31, 2025

1.7K
Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
09:32

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

Published on: June 30, 2014

22.0K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Orthopedics

Background:

  • Bone density is a critical indicator of bone health and fracture risk.
  • Accurate and non-invasive methods for bone density assessment are essential in clinical practice.
  • Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) is a standard for bone density measurement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the relationship between ultrasonic reflection and bone density.
  • To determine the sensitivity of the Integrated Reflection Coefficient (IRC) to variations in bone density.
  • To compare ultrasonic reflection measurements with QCT in bovine cortical bone.

Main Methods:

  • Fourteen cylindrical bovine cortical bone samples (3.0-cm thick) were used.
  • Twenty ultrasonic (US) reflection signals were acquired per sample with a 2.0-mm step.
  • The Integrated Reflection Coefficient (IRC) was calculated and compared to Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) data.

Main Results:

  • Pearson's Correlation R-values above 0.5 were observed between IRC and QCT in seven samples.
  • Similar trends between QCT and IRC were noted in several segments, even for weaker correlations.
  • IRC demonstrated sensitivity to bone density variations.

Conclusions:

  • The Integrated Reflection Coefficient (IRC) is sensitive to bone density variations.
  • Ultrasonic reflection shows potential as a method for assessing bone density.
  • Further research could explore IRC's diagnostic capabilities in bone health assessment.