Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Establishing a Severe Corneal Inflammation Model in Rats Based on Corneal Epithelium Curettage Combined with Corneal Sutures
Published on: November 22, 2024
Interdevice variability of central corneal thickness measurement
Peter M Maloca1,2,3,4, Harald P Studer1,5, Renato Ambrósio6,7,8
1OCTlab, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement devices show significant variability. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) devices demonstrated superior accuracy, highlighting the need for careful device selection in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Optics
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Accurate central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement is crucial for ophthalmic diagnostics and surgical planning.
- Variability in CCT measurements between devices can lead to diagnostic errors and suboptimal clinical decisions.
- Understanding inter-device variability is essential for ensuring reliable patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the variability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements across a wide range of devices.
- To identify which CCT measurement technologies and specific devices exhibit the highest accuracy and lowest variability.
- To assess the clinical implications of inter-device variability in CCT measurements.
Main Methods:
- Consecutive CCT measurements were performed on 122 normal corneas from 61 subjects.
- Seven different devices utilizing Scheimpflug, Ultrasound (US), and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) technologies were employed.
- Device performance was assessed by calculating the deviation of each device's CCT measurement from the mean CCT value per eye.
Main Results:
- Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) devices, particularly Cirrus OCT, demonstrated the lowest deviation from the mean CCT.
- Deviations ranged from 4.2±3.2 μm (Cirrus OCT) to 12.8±5.0 μm (Topcon noncontact specular microscopy).
- Ultrasound pachymetry showed substantial maximum differences (up to 120 μm) compared to other devices.
Conclusions:
- Significant inter-device variations in CCT measurements exist, potentially leading to under- or overestimation.
- Relying on a single CCT measurement device may result in inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations.
- OCT technology offers superior accuracy for central corneal thickness measurement compared to other tested methods.
Related Concept Videos
Measures of Central Tendency
The Central Dogma
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Graphs of Equations in Two Variables
Variables Affecting Phosphorescence and Fluorescence

