Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

6.7K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
6.7K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.7K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.7K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.1K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.1K
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Overview01:21

Sample Preparation for Analysis: Overview

3.7K
Sample preparation is an essential step in the analytical process. It involves preparing a sample so that it can be analyzed accurately. The goal is to extract the analyte, the substance you want to measure, from the sample while removing any components that may interfere with the analysis. Sample preparation techniques vary depending on the physical state of the sample.
Bulk or large solid samples are typically reduced in size using grinding, crushing, or milling techniques to increase the...
3.7K
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

3.3K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating data extraction error by a large language model from randomised controlled trials: a large-scale empirical study.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

A novel visualization approach for network meta-analysis: The plate plot and the nmaplateplot R package.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Evidence contamination: what it is and why it matters.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Tipping point analysis in network meta-analysis.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Evaluating the proper use of weighted mean difference in evidence synthesis: a meta-epidemiology study.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.9K

Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes.

Lifeng Lin1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 14, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sampling error in small studies can bias meta-analysis results, especially for standardized mean difference, odds ratio, and risk ratio. Researchers must account for this error when sample sizes are small.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
10:16

Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis

Published on: December 16, 2016

50.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

77.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Meta-analyses often incorporate studies with limited sample sizes.
  • Researchers frequently overlook the impact of sampling error in within-study variances.
  • Treating sample variances as true variances can introduce significant bias in meta-analysis outcomes, particularly with small sample sizes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the bias introduced by sampling error in meta-analyses.
  • To evaluate the influence of sampling error across various effect sizes and heterogeneity levels.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted extensive simulation studies for meta-analyses with continuous and binary outcomes.
  • Simulated studies with diverse sample sizes and heterogeneity.
  • Assessed bias and confidence interval coverage for five common effect sizes: mean difference, standardized mean difference, odds ratio, risk ratio, and risk difference.

Main Results:

  • Sampling error caused noticeable bias in standardized mean difference, odds ratio, risk ratio, and risk difference, but not the mean difference.
  • Bias in odds ratio and risk ratio was evident even with individual study sample sizes over 50 in some scenarios.
  • Hedges' g demonstrated potentially greater bias in meta-analysis results compared to Cohen's d.

Conclusions:

  • Meta-analyses involving small sample sizes require careful consideration of sampling error.
  • Within-study variances should not be treated as true variances; their sampling error must be accounted for.
  • Recommendations for improved meta-analysis practices when dealing with small sample sizes.