Diagnostic value of longitudinal flow gradient for the presence of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Michiel J Bom1, Roel S Driessen1, Pieter G Raijmakers2
1Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
The longitudinal myocardial blood flow (MBF) gradient from positron emission tomography (PET) is not a reliable indicator for diagnosing significant coronary artery disease (CAD). Hyperaemic MBF showed better diagnostic value than the longitudinal MBF gradient.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Nuclear Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis relies on assessing haemodynamic significance.
- Positison emission tomography (PET) derived longitudinal myocardial blood flow (MBF) gradient is a proposed non-invasive index for CAD.
- The diagnostic accuracy of this gradient needs further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the longitudinal MBF gradient in identifying haemodynamically significant CAD.
- To compare the diagnostic value of longitudinal MBF gradient with hyperaemic MBF.
- To explore the influence of lesion location on the correlation between longitudinal MBF gradient and fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Main Methods:
- 204 patients with suspected CAD underwent [15O]H2O PET and invasive coronary angiography with FFR.
- Longitudinal base-to-apex MBF gradients were calculated using two methods based on myocardial segments.
- Correlation and diagnostic value of longitudinal MBF gradients and hyperaemic MBF were assessed against FFR ≤ 0.80.
Main Results:
- Longitudinal MBF gradients showed weak correlation with FFR (r=0.12-0.22).
- Diagnostic value of longitudinal MBF gradients was lower compared to hyperaemic MBF for significant CAD.
- Correlation between longitudinal MBF gradients and FFR was absent in proximal lesions but significant in non-proximal lesions (r=0.57).
Conclusions:
- PET-derived longitudinal MBF gradients have limited diagnostic value for haemodynamically significant CAD compared to hyperaemic MBF.
- Lesion location influences the correlation between longitudinal flow parameters and FFR, suggesting normalization to normally perfused areas may contribute to the gradient.
- Further research is needed to understand the role of longitudinal flow gradients in CAD assessment.
Aims:
The longitudinal myocardial blood flow (MBF) gradient derived from positron emission tomography (PET) has been proposed as an emerging non-invasive index of haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of longitudinal MBF gradient for the presence of haemodynamically significant CAD.
Methods And Results:
A total of 204 patients (603 vessels) with suspected CAD underwent [15O]H2O PET followed by invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) of all major coronary arteries. Longitudinal base-to-apex MBF gradients were assessed by two methods, using MBF in apical and mid (Method 1) or in apical and basal (Method 2) myocardial segments to calculate the gradient. The hyperaemic longitudinal MBF gradient was only weakly correlated with FFR (Method 1: r = 0.12, P = 0.02; Method 2: r = 0.22, P < 0.001). The hyperaemic longitudinal MBF gradient (by both methods), had lower diagnostic value when compared with hyperaemic MBF for the presence of haemodynamically significant CAD, defined as an FFR ≤ 0.80. No significant correlations between longitudinal MBF gradients and FFR were noted in proximal lesions, whereas longitudinal MBF gradients and FFR were significantly correlated in non-proximal lesions (r = 0.57, P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
PET measured longitudinal flow parameters had lower diagnostic value when compared with hyperaemic MBF for the presence of haemodynamically significant CAD. Since lesion location was found to affect the correlation of PET measured longitudinal flow parameters and FFR, presence of a longitudinal flow gradient may be partly caused by normalization to a relatively normal perfused areas.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

