Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care01:29

Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care

371
The management of chronic pancreatitis is multifaceted, involving a comprehensive approach that includes thorough assessment, diagnostic testing, and a variety of management strategies.
Assessment:
371
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

2.6K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
2.6K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

2.3K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
2.3K
Quality of Water01:19

Quality of Water

568
In concrete preparation, the quality of water is paramount as it affects the strength and durability of the concrete. Potable water is usually preferred; however, it must not have excessive sodium or potassium to prevent compromising the concrete's integrity. Water quality is typically evaluated based on impurities such as dissolved solids, chlorides, and sulfates, and its pH value is ideally between 6 and 8. Even slightly acidic natural water may be acceptable unless it contains harmful...
568
Pulse amplitude and quality01:17

Pulse amplitude and quality

3.2K
Pulse amplitude is a crucial indicator of cardiac health because it provides valuable insights into the strength of left ventricular contractions and the overall uniformity of blood circulation within the vasculature. The strength of the pulse is directly related to the force with which the heart contracts and the volume of blood being pumped.
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
3.2K
Testing Water Quality01:14

Testing Water Quality

391
When the quality of water for concrete preparation is uncertain, its impact on the setting time of cement and compressive strength of mortar is assessed by comparison with de-ionized or distilled water benchmarks. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) C1602 requires the setting times to be within 90 minutes of the control, British Standard (BS) 3146:1980 allows a 30-minute variance in the initial setting, while British Standards European Norm (BS EN) 1008 specifies initial setting...
391

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond Work Relative Value Unit: Rationale for Strategic Partnership Between Health Systems and Departments of Surgery.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

From Safer Cholecystectomy to Smarter Bile Duct Management.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same author

From Alpha to Omicron and Beyond: Associations Between SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Surgical Outcomes.

The Journal of surgical research·2024
Same author

Barriers to Participation in a Structured Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Emergency Department Visits-A Qualitative Study.

The Journal of surgical research·2024
Same author

Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: impact on reflux and weight loss.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery·2024
Same author

Metabolic Surgery for Diabetes Management.

JAMA surgery·2024
Same journal

Small Incisions, Big Impact-Robotic Surgery Is Revolutionizing Cancer Care.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

TeleSurgery: The Present and the Future for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive/Robotic Surgery for Colon Cancer.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation.

Surgical oncology clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

446

Surgical Collaboratives for Quality Improvement.

Amir A Ghaferi1

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, NCRC, Building 16, Room 140E, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America
|September 15, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Collaborative quality improvement, combining local, regional, and national efforts, is the most effective strategy for enhancing surgical care quality. This approach overcomes the limitations of traditional top-down or isolated local initiatives for sustainable improvement.

Keywords:
CollaborationCollaborativesCultureImprovementOutcomesQualitySafety

More Related Videos

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.6K
Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

446
BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers
07:26

BioMEMS: Forging New Collaborations Between Biologists and Engineers

Published on: November 1, 2007

8.6K
Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System
10:09

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing CCM System

Published on: October 1, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Quality Improvement
  • Healthcare Management
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • Historical approaches to surgical quality improvement have primarily involved top-down national policies or isolated local hospital/practice efforts.
  • These traditional methods have demonstrated limitations in achieving sustainable and meaningful enhancements in surgical care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the limitations of existing surgical quality improvement strategies.
  • To identify the most effective means for achieving sustainable improvements in surgical care quality.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of historical and current surgical quality improvement initiatives.
  • Analysis of the effectiveness and limitations of top-down, local, and collaborative approaches.

Main Results:

  • Top-down national policies and local hospital-level efforts have inherent limitations.
  • Collaborative quality improvement, integrating local, regional, and national efforts, demonstrates superior effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • Collaborative quality improvement represents the most effective strategy for achieving sustainable, meaningful advancements in surgical care.
  • A multi-level, integrated approach is essential for overcoming the shortcomings of isolated quality improvement efforts.