Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Merits and caveats of propensity scores to adjust for confounding
Edouard L Fu1, Rolf H H Groenwold1, Carmine Zoccali2
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Proper adjustment for confounding is essential when estimating the effects of treatments or risk factors on health outcomes in observational data. To this end, various statistical methods have been developed. In the past couple of years, the use of propensity scores (PSs) to control for confounding has increased. Proper understanding of this method is necessary to critically appraise research in which it is applied. In this article, we provide an overview of PS methods, explaining their concept, advantages and possible disadvantages. Furthermore, the use of PS matching, PS adjustment and PS weighting is illustrated using data from the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD) cohort of dialysis patients.
Related Concept Videos
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Adjusting a Traverse
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...

