Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

An Improved Method for Collection of Cerebrospinal Fluid from Anesthetized Mice
Published on: March 19, 2018
A new method to improve the prediction of the celestial pole offsets
Santiago Belda1,2, José M Ferrándiz3, Robert Heinkelmann4
1Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Alicante, Carretera San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, San Vicente del Raspeig, E-03690, Alicante, Spain. Santiago.belda@ua.es.
None:
Knowledge of the Earth's changing rotation is fundamental to positioning objects in space and on the planet. Nowadays, the Earth's orientation in space is expressed by five Earth Orientation Parameters (EOP). Many applications in astronomy, geosciences, and space missions require accurate EOP predictions. Operational predictions are released daily by the Rapid Service/Prediction Centre of the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS). The prediction procedures and performances differ for the three EOP classes: polar motion, rotation angle (UT1-UTC), and the two celestial pole offsets (CPO), dX and dY. The IERS Annual Report 2016 shows Rapid Service CPO predictions errors with respect to IERS 08 C04 observations in 2016 ranging from 120 to 140 microas in 40 days for dX, and 100-160 microas for dY. We test a new method for the CPO prediction based on the recent availability of sophisticated empirical models for the Free Core Nutation, a main component of the CPO variations. We found it allows predicting both CPO with error estimates for the period 2000-2016 lower than the 2016 Rapid Service products, reaching about 85 microas after 40 days and near 90 microas after a year. These results would represent a 35-40% improvement.
Related Concept Videos
Pole and System Stability
Simple poles are unique roots of the denominator polynomial. Each simple pole corresponds to a distinct solution to the system's characteristic equation, typically resulting in exponential decay terms in the system's...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

