Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
The effectiveness of magnetic stimulation for patients with pelvic floor dysfunction: A systematic review and
Hong Pan1, Yong Bao2, Honghao Cao3
1College of Preventive Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Aims:
To evaluate the value of magnetic stimulation (MS) in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD).
Methods:
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed. We searched five databases for articles published until November 2017. Included studies investigated the effects of MS on PFD. Meta-analysis of RCTs was performed using a random effects model, and narrative analysis was undertaken where meta-analysis was not possible.
Results:
A total of 20 studies including 1019 patients were eligible for inclusion whose level of evidence for the included studies was low. Meta-analysis of four trials comparing MS with sham intervention showed that MS was not associated with significant improvement in ICIQ-SF score (-0.52, 95%CI -1.05, 0.01; P = 0.06, I2 = 16%), QOL score (-0.27, 95%CI -0.57, 0.04; P = 0.09, I2 = 0%), number of leakages (-0.16, 95%CI -0.62, 0.29; P = 0.48, I2 = 52%), and pad test (-1.36, 95%CI -2.64, -0.08; P = 0.04, I2 = 94%). Narrative review showed that there were no convincing evidences that MS was effective for chronic pelvic floor pain, detrusor overactivity, overactive bladder, and the included RCTs had controversial results. MS may have some benefits for nocturnal enuresis and erectile dysfunction according to the trials.
Conclusions:
There is no convinced evidence to support the benefits of using MS in the management of PFD. The applicability of MS in the treatment of PFD remains uncertain, so larger, well-designed trials with longer follow-up periods adopted relevant and comparable outcomes are needed to be further explored to provide a definitive conclusion.
Insights
Magnetic stimulation (MS) offers no convincing evidence for treating pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD). Further large-scale, well-designed trials are necessary to determine its true therapeutic value.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Gynecology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) encompasses a range of conditions affecting the pelvic floor muscles.
- Magnetic stimulation (MS) is a non-invasive therapeutic modality explored for various medical conditions.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, searching five databases up to November 2017.
- Included studies focused on the effects of MS on PFD, with meta-analysis of RCTs and narrative analysis performed.
Key Points:
- Low-level evidence from 20 studies (1019 patients) indicated MS did not significantly improve ICIQ-SF, QOL scores, or leakage episodes.
- Meta-analysis showed no significant improvement in ICIQ-SF, QOL, leakage, or pad test results compared to sham interventions.
- Narrative review found no convincing evidence for MS efficacy in chronic pelvic floor pain, detrusor overactivity, or overactive bladder.
Conclusions:
- Current evidence does not support the use of MS for managing PFD.
- The effectiveness of MS for PFD remains uncertain, necessitating larger, high-quality trials with standardized outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Muscles of the Pelvic Floor and Perineum
Perineal Layer
The perineum is a diamond-shaped area below the pelvic diaphragm, divided into an anterior urogenital triangle that contains the external genitals and a posterior anal triangle housing the anus. The urogenital...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

