Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Differential Leveling01:12

Differential Leveling

718
Differential leveling is a precise method in surveying used to determine the elevation difference between two points. Its primary goal is to establish accurate vertical measurements to create level surfaces or grade lines critical for designing and constructing infrastructures such as roads, bridges, and buildings.The procedure for differential leveling begins with setting up and leveling the instrument at a point where the benchmark can be seen. The level rod is held on the benchmark (BM), and...
718
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

21.5K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated....
21.5K
Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

33.9K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
33.9K
Interval Level of Measurement00:55

Interval Level of Measurement

19.1K
For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between...
19.1K
Nominal Level of Measurement00:56

Nominal Level of Measurement

39.0K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
39.0K
Leveling Effect01:29

Leveling Effect

1.4K
In acid-base chemistry, the leveling effect refers to the limitation imposed by the solvent on the strength of acids and bases in solution. When a base stronger than the solvent's conjugate base is used, it deprotonates the solvent until the base is entirely consumed, making it ineffective against weaker acids. Conversely, an acid stronger than the solvent's conjugate acid protonates the solvent until the acid is depleted, rendering it ineffective against weaker bases. Essentially, the...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychological resilience on the frontlines: Operational Resilience Training for Ukrainian combat medics.

Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same author

Defining Acute Stress Reactions to support large scale combat operations.

Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same author

"Crawl, walk, run": A graded approach to integrating mental skills for psychological resilience in training for large-scale combat operations.

Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same author

SAFEGUARD: Transforming Military Suicide Prevention Through Predictive Analytics and Targeted Interventions.

Current psychiatry reports·2026
Same author

Transfer of a leadership training intervention prior to COVID-19 on leadership support during the pandemic.

Journal of managerial psychology·2026
Same author

Leader-Inspired Nutrition: A Framework for Promoting Healthy Nutrition Behaviors and a Nutritionally Fueled and Fit Military Force.

Nutrients·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
06:46

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.4K

Improving the measurement of group-level constructs by optimizing between-group differentiation.

Paul D Bliese1, Mark A Maltarich1, Jonathan L Hendricks1

  • 1Management Department.

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|September 18, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Researchers can improve group-level analyses by validating measurement scales using item-level intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(1)). This method enhances the scale's ability to differentiate between groups, boosting predictive validity.

More Related Videos

Improved Generation of Induced Cardiomyocytes Using a Polycistronic Construct Expressing Optimal Ratio of Gata4, Mef2c and Tbx5
10:05

Improved Generation of Induced Cardiomyocytes Using a Polycistronic Construct Expressing Optimal Ratio of Gata4, Mef2c and Tbx5

Published on: November 13, 2015

9.1K
Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement
09:43

Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement

Published on: November 7, 2017

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder
06:46

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Urodynamic Method for Precise Urine Measurement in Awake Mice with Neurogenic Bladder

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.4K
Improved Generation of Induced Cardiomyocytes Using a Polycistronic Construct Expressing Optimal Ratio of Gata4, Mef2c and Tbx5
10:05

Improved Generation of Induced Cardiomyocytes Using a Polycistronic Construct Expressing Optimal Ratio of Gata4, Mef2c and Tbx5

Published on: November 13, 2015

9.1K
Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement
09:43

Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement

Published on: November 7, 2017

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Multilevel modeling
  • Psychometrics
  • Quantitative psychology

Background:

  • Group-level constructs are often measured by aggregating individual responses to multi-item scales.
  • Current validation practices for group-level constructs may not effectively differentiate between groups.
  • Existing validation methods primarily use procedures designed for individual-level constructs, potentially missing item-level group differentiation information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate current measurement validation practices for group-level constructs.
  • To propose an enhanced validation approach incorporating item-level group differentiation.
  • To demonstrate the utility of item-level intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(1)) in improving group-level scale validation.

Main Methods:

  • A 10-year review of multilevel articles in top journals was conducted.
  • Previously published datasets were re-analyzed.
  • Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(1)) was calculated for each scale item.

Main Results:

  • Current validation practices for group-level constructs may be suboptimal for differentiating groups.
  • Item-level ICC(1) estimates provide unique information not captured by traditional methods.
  • Utilizing item-level ICC(1) can lead to group-level scales with higher ICC(1) values.
  • Enhanced scales demonstrate improved predictive validity.

Conclusions:

  • Group-level measurement validation should be augmented with item-level group differentiation information.
  • Researchers should supplement conventional validation with item-level ICC(1) values.
  • This approach enhances the development and modification of scales for assessing group-level constructs.