Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
Published on: November 21, 2019
Sign-tracking is an expectancy-mediated behavior that relies on prediction error mechanisms
Rifka C Derman1, Kevin Schneider2, Shaina Juarez3
1Department of Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA.
Sign-tracking and goal-tracking behaviors in Pavlovian conditioning are both influenced by reward expectancies and emerge via a common prediction error mechanism, suggesting more similar psychological processes than previously thought.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral neuroscience
- Learning and memory
- Addiction research
Background:
- Appetitive Pavlovian conditioning can elicit sign-tracking (directed at the conditioned stimulus) and goal-tracking (directed at reward location).
- These behaviors are linked to addiction vulnerability and are hypothesized to involve distinct motivational and cognitive processes.
- Understanding their underlying associative mechanisms is crucial for clarifying their roles in behavior and potential clinical implications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether sign-tracking and goal-tracking rely on similar or distinct associative learning mechanisms.
- To differentiate between incentive motivational and cognitive process accounts of these behaviors.
- To determine the role of prediction error mechanisms in the development of both behaviors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized illness-induced outcome devaluation to assess the role of reward expectancies in sign-tracking and goal-tracking.
- Employed Kamin blocking procedures to examine shared prediction error mechanisms across both behavioral types.
- Designed experiments where sign-tracking CSs were used to block goal-tracking CSs, and vice versa.
Main Results:
- Outcome devaluation significantly reduced sign-tracking, confirming its control by reward expectancies.
- Post-conditioned stimulus (CS) goal-tracking was also sensitive to outcome devaluation.
- Kamin blocking effects were observed in both directions (sign-tracking blocking goal-tracking, and goal-tracking blocking sign-tracking), indicating a common prediction error mechanism.
Conclusions:
- Sign-tracking and goal-tracking are both sensitive to outcome devaluation, supporting their basis in reward expectancies.
- The observation of Kamin blocking across both behaviors suggests a shared associative learning mechanism, specifically involving prediction errors.
- These findings challenge the notion of fundamentally distinct psychological processes underlying sign- and goal-tracking, suggesting greater overlap than previously assumed.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Value
Fundamental Attribution Error
Sign Convention
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
Signs of Puberty
Introduction to the Sign Test
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

