Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Methods for the Study of the Zebrafish Maxillary Barbel
Published on: November 23, 2009
On the relationship between maxillary molar root shape and jaw kinematics in
Kornelius Kupczik1, Viviana Toro-Ibacache2,3, Gabriele A Macho4,5
1Max Planck Weizmann Center for Integrative Archaeology and Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Abstract:
Plio-Pleistocene hominins from South Africa remain poorly understood. Here, we focus on how Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus exploited and-in part-partitioned their environment. Specifically, we explore the extent to which first maxillary molar roots (M1) are oriented and thus, by proxy, estimate the direction of loads habitually exerted on the chewing surface. Landmark-based shape analysis of M1 root reconstructions of 26 South African hominins and three East African Paranthropus boisei suggest that A. africanus may have been able to dissipate the widest range of laterally directed loads. Paranthropus robustus and P. boisei, despite having overlapping morphologies, differ in aspects of root shape/size, dento-cranial morphologies, microwear textures and C4 food consumption. Hence, while Paranthropus monophyly cannot be excluded, equivalence of dietary niche can. The South African hominins occupied distinct ecological niches, whereby P. robustus appears uniquely adapted to dissipate antero-posteriorly directed loads.
Related Concept Videos
Molar Mass
Applications of the Ideal Gas Law: Molar Mass, Density, and Volume
Relationship Formation
Kinematic Equations - I
Ending Relationships
Kinematic Equations - II
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...

