Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
A comparison of aortic root measurements by echocardiography and computed tomography
Tomasz Plonek1, Mikolaj Berezowski1, Maciej Bochenek2
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Insights
Single-plane imaging underestimates aortic root dimensions, especially in bicuspid aortic valve patients. Three-dimensional analysis provides a more accurate assessment of aortic root and sinus of Valsalva measurements.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Radiology
- Anatomy
Background:
- Accurate aortic root measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing cardiovascular conditions.
- Traditional imaging methods may not fully capture the complex geometry of the aortic root.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the optimal method for assessing aortic root and sinus of Valsalva dimensions.
- To investigate the underestimation of aortic root dimensions by single-plane imaging techniques.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography images from 112 patients.
- Measurement of aortic root and sinus of Valsalva dimensions using 3D multiplanar reconstruction.
- Comparison of 3D measurements with conventional 2D echocardiography and computed tomography angiography.
Main Results:
- A significant difference (5.4 ± 3.2 mm) exists between minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions.
- This difference is more pronounced in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.
- Single-plane measurements (echocardiography, 2D CT) significantly underestimated maximum aortic root dimensions compared to 3D analysis.
Conclusions:
- Aortic root dimensions are significantly underestimated by single-plane imaging.
- Three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction offers a more accurate assessment.
- Clinical practice should consider 3D imaging for precise aortic root evaluation, particularly in specific patient groups.
Objectives:
The aim of the study is to evaluate an optimal way to assess the dimensions of the aortic root and each of the sinuses of Valsalva and examine how a single measurement in 1 plane (echocardiography or 2-dimensional computed tomography) can underestimate the maximum dimension of the aortic root.
Methods:
Computed tomography and transthoracic echocardiography images of the aortic root and ascending aorta of 112 patients were analyzed. The minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions, the root perimeter, and the total area of all 3 sinuses of Valsalva were measured on a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the aorta using 3-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction. Moreover, the maximum root dimension was compared with the measurements obtained from the echocardiography and 2-dimensional computed tomography angiography measurements.
Results:
The difference in the measurements of the minimum and maximum root dimension was 5.4 ± 3.2 mm (range, 0-21 mm, P < .0001) and was significantly larger in patients with bicuspid aortic valves compared with those with tricuspid valves (6.3 ± 4 mm, range, 0-21 mm vs 4.9 ± 2.6 mm, range, 0-15 mm, P = .036). The maximum root dimension measured in 3-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (49.1 ± 9.0 mm) differed significantly from the root dimension measured in transthoracic echocardiography in the parasternal long-axis view (44.8 ± 8.4 mm) and 2-dimensional computed tomography (axial plane: 45.5 ± 9.0 mm, coronal plane: 46.1 ± 8.8 mm, sagittal plane: 45.1 ± 8.9 mm) (P < .001).
Conclusions:
The difference in the measurements of the minimum and maximum aortic root dimensions is significant and may exceed 20 mm, especially in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Therefore, aortic root dimensions can be significantly underestimated with the measurement (echocardiography, computed tomography angiography) performed in only 1 plane.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

