Impact of a Pressure Injury Prevention Bundle in the Solutions for Patient Safety Network

Gary Frank1, Kathleen E Walsh1, Sharyl Wooton1

  • 1Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Children's Hospital of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Liberty Mutual Insurance, Boston, Mass.; Hospital Administration, Department of Quality Improvement, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; and The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

Pediatric Quality & Safety
|September 20, 2018
PubMed

Insights

Pediatric hospitals reduced pressure injury (PI) rates by implementing an active surveillance and prevention bundle. Reliable bundle implementation significantly lowered stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Healthcare
  • Patient Safety
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Pediatric hospitals face challenges in reducing pressure injury (PI) rates.
  • Implementing standardized prevention strategies is crucial for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of an active surveillance and prevention bundle on pressure injury rates in pediatric hospitals.
  • To assess the association between the implementation of bundle elements and pressure injury reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized negative binomial analyses to assess changes in PI rates in hospitals participating since 2011.
  • Employed funnel charts to examine the relationship between bundle implementation compliance and PI rates among all participating hospitals.
  • The Children's Hospitals Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS) Network implemented a three-pronged approach: active surveillance, bundle compliance measurement, and wound ostomy team deployment.

Main Results:

  • A significant decline in stage 3 pressure injuries (0.06 to 0.03 per 1,000 patient-days) and stage 4 pressure injuries (0.01 to 0.004 per 1,000 patient-days) was observed in phase 1 hospitals.
  • Hospitals achieving 80% prevention bundle compliance demonstrated significantly lower PI rates compared to the overall cohort.
  • The study included 33 hospitals in phase 1 (2011-2013) and 78 hospitals across phases 1 and 2 (2013).

Conclusions:

  • The implementation of the prevention bundle by SPS hospitals led to a significant reduction in stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries over two years.
  • Consistent and reliable implementation of each component of the prevention bundle is associated with decreased pressure injury rates.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure of Solutions02:40

Osmosis and Osmotic Pressure of Solutions

A number of natural and synthetic materials exhibit selective permeation, meaning that only molecules or ions of a certain size, shape, polarity, charge, and so forth, are capable of passing through (permeating) the material. Biological cell membranes provide elegant examples of selective permeation in nature, while dialysis tubing used to remove metabolic wastes from blood is a more simplistic technological example. Regardless of how they may be fabricated, these materials are generally...
46.7K
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention01:30

Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention

Accurate diagnosis and effective prevention are critical in managing Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), which is linked to high mortality rates ranging from 10% to 80%. Timely recognition of at-risk patients and careful monitoring can significantly reduce the likelihood of kidney damage.Diagnostic Assessments:The diagnostic process starts with a comprehensive medical history to identify prerenal, intrarenal, and postrenal causes.Prerenal causes, such as dehydration, hypotension, or blood loss, should...
340
Ideal Solutions02:24

Ideal Solutions

According to Raoult’s law, the partial vapor pressure of a solvent in a solution is equal or identical to the vapor pressure of the pure solvent multiplied by its mole fraction in the solution. However, Raoult's Law is only valid for ideal solutions. For a solution to be ideal, the solvent-solute interaction must be just as strong as a solvent-solvent or solute-solute interaction. This suggests that both the solute and the solvent would use the same amount of energy to escape to the...
22.5K
Survey Safety01:28

Survey Safety

Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
398
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.6K
Solution Formation02:16

Solution Formation

There is no one solvent that can dissolve every type of solute. Some substances that readily dissolve in a certain solvent might be insoluble in a different solvent. A simple way to predict which substances dissolve in which solvent is the phrase "like dissolves like". This means that polar substances, such as salt and sugar, dissolve in a polar substance like water. In contrast, non-polar substances are more soluble in non-polar solvents such as carbon tetrachloride.
This selective...
37.7K