Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Ultrasonographic Assessment During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Published on: October 24, 2020
Insights
Advanced pediatric life support (APLS) recommendations need more scientific study. This article reviews APLS controversies, aiming for consensus and further research on pediatric resuscitation.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
- Advanced Pediatric Life Support (APLS)
Background:
- Current pediatric resuscitation guidelines often lack robust scientific evidence, relying on anecdotal experience.
- Significant knowledge gaps exist in pediatric advanced life support (APLS) protocols.
- There is a need to establish evidence-based practices for pediatric emergencies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the scientific basis for controversial issues in APLS.
- To identify areas lacking sufficient scientific information in pediatric resuscitation.
- To foster consensus on critical APLS questions and stimulate further research.
Main Methods:
- Review and discussion of scientific literature pertaining to APLS controversies.
- Analysis of unique APLS issues including vascular access, drug delivery, dosages, and paramedic training/equipment.
- Comparison of shared controversies between APLS and adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACLS), such as drug choices (calcium, epinephrine, isoproterenol, methoxamine, bicarbonate).
Main Results:
- A consensus was reached on some controversial APLS issues through discussion.
- Key areas requiring further scientific investigation were identified.
- The scientific rationale behind specific APLS interventions was evaluated.
Conclusions:
- Further scientific study is crucial to strengthen APLS recommendations.
- Consensus building is a valuable step, but empirical data is needed.
- This review highlights the need for evidence-based advancements in pediatric emergency care.
Abstract:
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children is not well studied; many of the current recommendations for advanced pediatric life support (APLS) are based on anecdotal experience rather than scientific study. The following are unique issues in APLS requiring a consensus decision: What are the best methods of vascular access and of drug delivery and dosages? What constitutes minimal paramedic training and equipment? There are also many shared controversies between APLS and ACLS, including the use of calcium, epinephrine vs isoproterenol, methoxamine, and bicarbonate. This article presents the scientific basis for these controversial issues and highlights areas where information is lacking. A discussion of these questions generated a consensus on some issues and hopefully will stimulate further study to answer the questions that were raised.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques

