Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Measurement properties for the revised patient-reported OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire
N Østerås1, A T Tveter1, A M Garratt2
1National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, PO Box 23 Vinderen, N-0319, Oslo, Norway.
The revised Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire version 2 demonstrates strong reliability and validity for assessing patient-reported osteoarthritis care quality. This updated version is recommended for future research and clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Health Services Research
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Osteoarthritis (OA) significantly impacts patient quality of life.
- Accurate assessment of OA care quality is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Existing quality indicators require validation for reliability and responsiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Osteoarthritis Quality Indicator (OA-QI) questionnaire version 2 (v2).
- To determine if OA-QI v2 is a suitable tool for measuring patient-reported quality of osteoarthritis care.
Main Methods:
- A longitudinal cohort study involving patients attending an OA education program.
- The OA-QI v2 was administered at four time points: pre-program (two weeks prior, immediately prior), immediately post-program, and three months post-program.
- Test-retest reliability, construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability (including smallest detectable change and minimal important change) were assessed.
Main Results:
- High test-retest reliability was observed (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.89).
- Construct validity was confirmed, with all six predefined hypotheses met.
- Responsiveness was acceptable, with most predefined hypotheses confirmed.
- No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Smallest detectable change (SDC95%) was 29.1 (individual) and 3.0 (group); minimal important change (MIC) was 20.4.
Conclusions:
- The OA-QI v2 exhibits superior reliability and acceptable validity compared to version 1.
- The questionnaire demonstrates good responsiveness, supporting its use as an outcome measure in OA care improvement studies.
- OA-QI v2 is recommended for future research and clinical application in assessing osteoarthritis patient care quality.
Related Concept Videos
Indicators
Data Reporting and Recording
Measurement: Standard Units
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quality Assurance

