Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Circulating MicroRNA Quantification Using DNA-binding Dye Chemistry and Droplet Digital PCR
Published on: June 26, 2016
Applying Standard Clinical Chemistry Assay Validation to Droplet Digital PCR Quantitative Liquid Biopsy Testing
Dragana Milosevic1, John R Mills1, Michael B Campion2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Standard clinical chemistry protocols effectively validate droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assays for cell-free DNA oncology. This standardization enables reliable performance comparison and monitoring of quantitative ddPCR tests.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Oncology
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) shows promise for quantitative cell-free DNA analysis in oncology.
- Standardized assay validation is crucial for realizing the full potential of ddPCR technology.
- Existing clinical chemistry assay validation protocols can be adapted for ddPCR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate quantitative ddPCR assays for oncology applications using established clinical chemistry guidelines.
- To assess the performance criteria of ddPCR assays for KRAS, EGFR, and BRAF mutations.
- To demonstrate the applicability of standard laboratory-developed test regulations to ddPCR.
Main Methods:
- Validated KRAS, EGFR, and BRAF quantitative ddPCR assays following Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act regulations and CLSI guidelines.
- Evaluated key performance metrics including LOB, LOD, LOQ, imprecision, analytical range, linearity, accuracy, and stability.
- Compared ddPCR results with orthogonal platforms like next-generation sequencing.
Main Results:
- Established ddPCR assay parameters: LOB (4 copies), LOD (12-22 copies), LOQ (35-64 copies), and dynamic range up to 30,000 copies.
- Demonstrated excellent linearity down to LOQ and accurate spike recovery.
- Achieved qualitative agreement and quantitative concordance with orthogonal methods (R² 0.83-0.99).
- Determined reference range for wild-type copies in plasma (462-6169/mL).
Conclusions:
- Standard clinical chemistry assay validation protocols are suitable for quantitative ddPCR assays.
- This standardization facilitates assay performance comparison and the establishment of minimal significant change thresholds for monitoring.
- Validated ddPCR assays provide reliable quantitative data for oncology applications.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

