Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Complexities of Achilles Tendon Injuries — Research and Future Directions
Published on: October 27, 2023
Neuromechanical coupling within the human triceps surae and its consequence on individual force-sharing strategies
Marion Crouzier1, Lilian Lacourpaille1, Antoine Nordez1,2
1University of Nantes, Laboratory 'Movement, Interactions, Performance' (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, 44000 Nantes, France.
Abstract:
Little is known about the factors that influence the coordination of synergist muscles that act across the same joint, even during single-joint isometric tasks. The overall aim of this study was to determine the nature of the relationship between the distribution of activation and the distribution of force-generating capacity among the three heads of the triceps surae [soleus (SOL), gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL)]. Twenty volunteers performed isometric plantarflexions, during which the activation of GM, GL and SOL was estimated using electromyography (EMG). Functional muscle physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) was estimated using imaging techniques and was considered as an index of muscle force-generating capacity. The distribution of activation and PCSA among the three muscles varied greatly between participants. A significant positive correlation between the distribution of activation and the distribution of PCSA was observed when considering the two bi-articular muscles at intensities ≤50% of the maximal contraction (0.51<r<0.62). Specifically, the greater the PCSA of GM compared with GL, the stronger bias of activation to the GM. There was no significant correlation between monoarticular and biarticular muscles. A higher contribution of GM activation compared with GL activation was associated with lower triceps surae activation (-0.66<r<-0.42) and metabolic cost (-0.74<r<-0.52) for intensities ≥30% of the maximal contraction. Considered together, an imbalance of force between the three heads was observed, the magnitude of which varied greatly between participants. The origin and consequences of these individual force-sharing strategies remain to be determined.
Related Concept Videos
System of Forces and Couples
The principle of transmissibility plays a crucial role in this process. According to...
Simplification of a Force and Couple System I
Simplification of a Force and Couple System: II
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Intermolecular Forces
Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces

