[Staffing levels and patient-related outcomes : Systematic literature review on international evidence]
A Blume1, B Snellgrove2, T Steinert2
1Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I der Universität Ulm, Weissenau, ZfP Südwürttemberg, Weingartshofer Str. 2, 88214, Ravensburg, Deutschland. andreas.blume@zfp-zentrum.de.
Abstract:
The objective of this study was to systematically review the international literature with respect to significant links between staffing levels or qualification on the one hand and patient-related outcomes on the other. Of the initial 7778 abstracts identified by means of a complex search strand in PubMed and CINAHL, 51 could finally be included in a qualitative synthesis. A total of nine different patient-related outcome categories with significant associations on an at least ordinally scaled level were distinguished. None of the studies included had a (quasi-)experimental research design. Despite, in some instances, high numbers of cases at multiple sites and efforts to control obvious confounding variables by regression analysis, no evidence-based conclusions for health policy or clinical practice can be drawn from the available observational studies. There is therefore a considerable need for prospective randomized or at least quasi-experimental studies also as accompanying research on novel models of financing.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Internal Energy
Internal Receptors
Predicting Reaction Outcomes


