Immunosuppression is Inappropriately Qualifying the Immune Status of Septic and SIRS Patients

Immunosuppression is the most commonly used concept to qualify the immune status of patients with either sterile systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis. In this review we attempt to demonstrate that the concept of immunosuppression is an oversimplification of the complex anti-inflammatory response that occurs in patients dealing with a severe sterile or infectious insult. Particularly, the immune status of leukocytes varies greatly depending on the compartment from where they are derived from. Furthermore, although certain functions of immune cells present in the blood stream or in the hematopoietic organs can be significantly diminished, other functions are either unchanged or even enhanced. This juxtaposition illustrates that there is no global defect. The mechanisms called reprogramming or trained innate immunity are probably aimed at preventing a generalized deleterious inflammatory reaction, and work to maintain the defense mechanisms at their due levels.