Comparison of three approaches for femoral tunnel during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A
Tomomasa Nakamura1, Hideyuki Koga2, Koji Otabe2
1Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan; Sports Medicine Clinical Center, Medical Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Background:
It is still controversial whether which femoral tunnel creation technique is best during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We aimed to clarify the features of three different techniques based on the femoral tunnel position created with the same tunnel-creating concept and the measurement data.
Methods:
The femoral tunnel of double-bundle (DB) ACLR was created using the behind-remnant approach in a remnant preserved manner following the policy of our institute. The trans-tibial approach (TT) was applied for all primary ACL injured cases until December 2012. The trans-portal approach (TP) was applied from January to September 2013, and the outside-in approach (OI) was indicated from October 2013 to March 2014. We compared the femoral tunnel aperture positions with the postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Additionally, the femoral tunnel length and the septum distance of each anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel were analyzed.
Results:
The AM tunnel aperture position of TT was significantly higher and shallower than that of TP in knee flexion position. The femoral tunnel length of TP was significantly shorter than that of TT and OI. The septum between each tunnel of OI trended wider than that of TT and TP.
Conclusions:
The AM tunnel aperture position of TT runs the risk of a high and shallow position. TP runs the risk of insufficiently short tunnel length. It is important to apply each method flexibly to each case because no single best approach was found.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
01:26Muscles of the Anterior Neck
02:04Fixing Double-strand Breaks
01:13Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...