Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Inactivation of Medial Frontal Cortex Changes Risk Preference
1Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-2685, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-2685, USA.
Inactivating the supplementary eye field (SEF) reduced risky choices in animals by decreasing attraction to reward uncertainty and high gains. This highlights the SEF's causal role in risk preference during decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Decision Science
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Decision-making under uncertainty is influenced by risk preference, but the underlying neural circuits are not fully understood.
- The supplementary eye field (SEF) is implicated in oculomotor decision-making, including choices involving risk.
- Previous studies observed risk-related signals in SEF, but its causal role remains unclear due to similar activity in other frontal areas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the causal role of the supplementary eye field (SEF) in risky oculomotor decision-making.
- To determine how SEF inactivation affects choice behavior under conditions of uncertainty and varying reward potentials.
Main Methods:
- Inactivation of the supplementary eye field (SEF) in primates.
- Analysis of oculomotor choices in tasks involving varying degrees of risk and reward.
- Quantification of choice frequency, reward uncertainty attraction, and sensitivity to reward prediction errors.
Main Results:
- SEF inactivation significantly decreased the frequency of risky choices.
- The reduction in risky choices was primarily driven by diminished attraction to reward uncertainty and high potential gains.
- Inactivation did not alter the estimation of reward probability or average expected reward but increased sensitivity to reward prediction errors.
Conclusions:
- The supplementary eye field (SEF) plays a causal role in shaping risk preference during oculomotor decision-making.
- SEF's contribution to risky choices involves modulating the valuation of uncertain rewards and potential gains.
- SEF activity is crucial for risk-related valuation, rather than probability estimation or reward history adjustments.
More Related Videos
09:45Preparation of Parasagittal Slices for the Investigation of Dorsal-ventral Organization of the Rodent Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Published on: March 28, 2012
11:31Ex Vivo Optogenetic Interrogation of Long-Range Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity from Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Published on: February 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
X-Inactivation
Activation and Inactivation of G Proteins
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...