Distribution of DNA damage in the sperm nucleus: A study of zebrafish as a model of histone-packaged chromatin
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Study of the DNA Damage Checkpoint using Xenopus Egg Extracts
Published on: November 5, 2012
S González-Rojo1, C Fernández-Díez1, M Lombó1
1Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana s/n León, 24071, Spain.
Abstract:
Reproductive defects can occur when the integrity of the male gamete genome is affected. Sperm chromatin is not homogeneous, having relaxed regions which are more accessible to the transcription machinery in the embryo, and thought to be specially sensitive to DNA damage. The level of damage in specific genes located in these sensitive regions could represent an early biomarker of damage. Our objective is to test the hypothesis that these more relaxed regions show greater susceptibility to damage in zebrafish, a species lacking protamines and whose sperm chromatin is compacted with histones. After sperm UV irradiation, treatment with H2O2 and cryopreservation, global chromatin fragmentation was evaluated using the TUNEL assay, and the number of lesions per 10 Kb in specific genes (hoxa3a, hoxb5b, sox2, accessible for early transcription and rDNA 18S and rDNA 28S) was quantified by using a qPCR approach. Additionally, oxidative damage within the sperm nucleus and the potential colocalization of this injury with histone H3 and TOPO IIα+β were located by using immunofluorescence. UV irradiation produced the highest degree of fragmentation (p = 0.041) and the highest number of lesions per 10 Kb in all the genes, but no differences were observed in sensitivity to damage in the studied genes (ranging from 14.93 to 8.03 lesions per 10 Kb in hoxb5b and 28S, respectively). In contrast, H2O2 and cryopreservation caused varying levels of damage in the analyzed genes which was not related to their accessibility, ranging from 0.00 to 1.65 lesions per 10 Kb in 28S and hoxb5b, respectively, after H2O2 treatment, and from 0.073 to 5.51 in 28S and sox2, respectively, after cryopreservation. Immunodetection near oxidative lesions also revealed different spatial patterns depending on the treatments used, these being mostly homogeneous with UV irradiation or cryopreservation, and peripherally located around the nucleus after H2O2 treatment. Oxidative lesions did not colocalize with histone H3 or TOPO IIα+β, thus demonstrating that the relaxed DNA regions associated with these proteins were not more vulnerable to oxidative damage. Results suggest that accessibility of each agent to the nucleus could be the main factor responsible for the distribution of sperm DNA damage rather than the organization of the chromatin. Lesions in these genes important to early embryo development assayed in this study cannot be used as biomarkers of global DNA damage.
More Related Videos
09:25Genome-wide Analysis of Histone Modifications Distribution using the Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Method in Magnaporthe oryzae
Published on: June 2, 2021
11:06Chromatin Immunoprecipitation ChIP of Histone Modifications from Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published on: December 29, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Chromatin Packaging
The chromatin
In combination with specialized DNA binding protein called Histones, the DNA double helix forms a compact DNA: protein complex called chromatin. The chromatin itself is further compacted into higher-order...
Chromatin Packaging
Chromatin Packaging
DNA Packaging
Histone Modification
Acetylation
The enzyme histone acetyltransferase adds acetyl group to the histones. Another enzyme, histone...
Inheritance of Chromatin Structures