Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

A Mouse Model of Lumbar Spine Instability
Published on: April 23, 2021
Improving spine surgical access, appropriateness and efficiency in metropolitan, urban and rural settings
Mohammad Zarrabian1, Andrew Bidos1, Caroline Fanti1
1From the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man. (Zarrabian); the Toronto Western Hospital University Health Network, Toronto, Ont. (Bidos); the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Thunder Bay, Ont. (Fanti, Puskas); Absolute Chiropractic, Hamilton, Ont. (Young); the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. (Drew); the Arthritis Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud); and the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Rampersaud).
Background:
The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC) were developed to improve primary care assessment, education and management of patients with persistent or recurrent low back pain-related symptoms. This study aims to determine the effect of ISAEC on access for surgical assessment, referral appropriateness and efficiency for patients meeting a priori referral criteria in rural, urban and metropolitan settings.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective review of prospective data from networked ISAEC clinics in Thunder Bay, Hamilton and Toronto, Ontario. For patients meeting surgical referral criteria, wait times for surgical assessment, surgical referral-related magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and appropriateness of referral were recorded.
Results:
Overall 422 patients, representing 10% of all ISAEC patients in the study period, were referred for surgical assessment. The average wait times for surgical assessment were 5.4, 4.3 and 2.2 weeks at the metropolitan, urban and rural centres, respectively. Referral MRI usage for the group decreased by 31%. Of the patients referred for formal surgical assessment, 80% had leg-dominant pain and 96% were deemed appropriate surgical referrals.
Conclusion:
Contrary to geographic concentration of health care resources in metropolitan settings, the greatest decrease in wait times was achieved in the rural setting. A networked, shared-cared model of care for patients with low back pain-related symptoms significantly improved access for surgical assessment despite varying geographic practice settings and barriers. The greatest reductions were noted in the rural setting. In addition, significant improvements in referral appropriateness and efficiency were achieved compared with historical reports across all sites.
Related Concept Videos
Setting Time of Cement
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Alternative Sets of Equilibrium Equations
One example of such a situation can be observed in a...

