Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
Published on: January 10, 2013
Motor Control Training Compared With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Disc Herniation
Fábio Jorge Renovato França1, Bianca Callegari, Luiz Armando Vidal Ramos
1From the Department of Speech, Physical and Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (FJRF, LAVR, TNB, MOM, JC, APMCC, GPLA, APM); Laboratory of Human Motricity Studies, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil (BC); Federal University Amapá, Campus Binacional of Oiapoque, Amapá, Brazil (LAVR); and Federal University of Ceará, Ceará, Brazil (GPLA).
Objective:
The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of motor control training and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in relieving pain, reducing functional disability, and improving transversus abdominis activation in patients with lumbar disc herniation with associated radiculopathy.
Design:
This is a randomized controlled trial.
Methods:
Forty patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation were randomly divided into two groups: motor control training group (n = 20) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group (n = 20).
Interventions:
The motor control training group and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group attended 60 mini sessions twice a week for 8 wks, totaling to 16 sessions.
Main Outcome Measures:
The main outcome measures are pain, functional disability, and transversus abdominis activation capacity.
Results:
Differences between both groups were observed after 8 wks, favoring the motor control training group. Motor control training was more effective than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in relieving pain (mean difference = 3.3 points, 95% confidence interval = 2.12-4.48), reducing functional disability (mean difference = 8.4 points, 95% confidence interval = 5.44-11.36), improving the quality of pain (mean difference = 17 points, 95% confidence interval = 7.93-26.07), sensory quality of pain (mean difference = 10.3 points, 95% confidence interval = 5.55-15.05), and transversus abdominis activation (mean difference = 1.5 points, 95% confidence interval = 0.90-2.10).
Conclusions:
The results suggest that motor control training is more effective than transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with respect to relieving pain, reducing functional disability, and improving transversus abdominis activation in patients with lumbar disc herniation.
Related Concept Videos
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Combinatorial Gene Control
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
Control System Problem
When forming a closed-loop system, issues can arise if the poles cross into the unstable region, leading to potential...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Control Systems
At the heart...
Controller Configurations
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...

