Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Screening Assays to Characterize Novel Endothelial Regulators Involved in the Inflammatory Response
Published on: September 15, 2017
Role of systemic inflammatory response markers in urological malignancy
1Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Systemic inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, are valuable, inexpensive tools for predicting survival in urological cancer patients. These blood-based indicators offer crucial prognostic insights for clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pathology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Systemic inflammation significantly impacts cancer patient survival across various malignancies.
- Peripheral blood markers, including serum proteins and cell counts, effectively monitor this inflammatory response.
- Established indices like the Glasgow Prognostic Score and prognostic nutritional index combine these markers for enhanced prognostic evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the prognostic and predictive value of systemic inflammatory response markers in urological cancers.
- To highlight key markers such as C-reactive protein, Glasgow Prognostic Score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutritional index.
- To discuss the clinical utility and implications of these easily measurable, inexpensive markers.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of studies evaluating systemic inflammatory markers in urological cancer.
- Analysis of both pre-treatment and post-treatment marker values.
- Focus on commonly used indices: C-reactive protein, Glasgow Prognostic Score/modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and prognostic nutritional index.
Main Results:
- Hundreds of studies confirm the prognostic significance of systemic inflammatory markers in urological cancers.
- Pre-treatment marker values are most frequently studied for prognostic and predictive roles.
- These markers are readily available and cost-effective in clinical settings.
Conclusions:
- Systemic inflammatory markers are vital, accessible tools for assessing prognosis in urological cancer patients.
- Understanding these markers aids clinicians in patient management and treatment planning.
- Further integration of these markers into clinical practice can improve patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...
Inflammatory Response II: Inflammatory Exudate and Tissue Repair
The typical wound exudate is odorless, transparent, straw-colored, thin, and watery. Exudate, however, can differ depending on the state of wound healing. Likewise, the...
Inflammatory Response I: Vascular and Cellular
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Second Order systems II
First Order Systems
When a first-order system is subjected to a unit-step input, its response is characterized by its transfer function. By applying the Laplace transform of the unit-step input to the transfer function, expanding the...

