Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sign Convention01:30

Sign Convention

3.5K
When analyzing a beam subjected to various loads, it is crucial to understand the internal forces and moments generated within the structure. These internal forces can be broadly classified into normal forces, shear forces, and bending moments. To determine these forces and moments, we use the method of sections and apply a specific sign convention based on their direction and the side of the section being analyzed.
The normal force acts perpendicular to the beam's cross-section and can...
3.5K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

5.0K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.0K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

424
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
424
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.7K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.7K
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

8.8K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
8.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An updated systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization in Norwood procedure.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

Development of a core outcome set for studies on centralization of healthcare services.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Using routinely collected data for research purposes: challenges and mitigation strategies.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for scoping reviews: a scoping review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Simulated patient methodology applied in health services research: a scoping review.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Limited consensus in expert opinions on studies evaluating the design, conduct, analysis, or reporting of health research: a survey study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K

No differences were found between effect estimates from conventional and registry-based randomized controlled trials.

Tim Mathes1, Pauline Klaßen1, Dawid Pieper1

  • 1Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Chair of Surgical Research, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Street 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|September 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Registry-based randomized controlled trials (RRCTs) show no systematic differences compared to conventional randomized controlled trials (CRCTs) for objective outcomes. This meta-epidemiological study found similar effect estimates between RRCTs and CRCTs.

Keywords:
Health registriesPatient registriesRandomized controlled trialsStudy design

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
03:26

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain

Published on: March 8, 2024

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
03:53

Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management

Published on: March 15, 2024

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Registry-based randomized controlled trials (RRCTs) offer a potential alternative to conventional randomized controlled trials (CRCTs).
  • Assessing the concordance of results between RRCTs and CRCTs is crucial for validating RRCT methodology.
  • Previous meta-epidemiological studies have explored differences in effect estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if effect estimates from RRCTs systematically differ from those derived from CRCTs.
  • To compare the reliability and consistency of outcomes reported by RRCTs versus CRCTs.
  • To provide evidence for the validity of using registry data in randomized controlled trials.

Main Methods:

  • A meta-epidemiological study design was employed.
  • Identified RRCTs and subsequent systematic reviews including RRCTs.
  • Calculated pooled odds ratios for mortality and incidence measures, comparing RRCTs and CRCTs using odds ratio of pooled odds ratios (OROR).

Main Results:

  • Compared 15 mortality and 14 incidence effect estimates.
  • Observed 100% confidence interval overlap for all outcomes.
  • ORORs were 1.03 for mortality and 1.05 for incidence, indicating no significant systematic difference.

Conclusions:

  • Effect estimates from RRCTs do not systematically differ from CRCTs for objective outcomes.
  • The findings support the validity of RRCTs as a reliable method for clinical research.
  • No significant discrepancies were found in effect directions or magnitudes between trial types.