Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Simultaneous Mapping and Quantitation of Ribonucleotides in Human Mitochondrial DNA
Published on: November 14, 2017
The Accuracy Comparison of Three Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM)-Based Indoor Mapping Technologies
Yuwei Chen1, Jian Tang2,3, Changhui Jiang4,5
1Centre of Excellence in Laser Scanning Research, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Geodeetinrinne 2, FI-02431 Kirkkonummi, Finland. Yuwei.chen@nls.fi.
This study compares three indoor mapping systems: Matterport, SLAMMER, and NAVIS. SLAMMER achieved the highest accuracy (1.7 cm RMS error), offering a valuable guide for selecting Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) hardware for indoor Location Based Services (LBS).
Area of Science:
- Geomatics and Geospatial Technology
- Robotics and Artificial Intelligence
- Indoor Positioning and Mapping
Background:
- Growing demand for indoor Location Based Services (LBS) necessitates accurate and efficient indoor mapping.
- Traditional surveying methods struggle with the complexity and dynamic nature of indoor environments.
- Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) systems offer a promising alternative using sensors like LiDAR and depth cameras.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize and compare the performance of different indoor mapping systems.
- To provide guidance for selecting appropriate hardware for SLAM-based indoor mapping applications.
- To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of commercial and research-grade mapping systems.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of three indoor mapping systems: Matterport (depth cameras), SLAMMER (LiDAR, Hector-SLAM/Graph-SLAM), and NAVIS (LiDAR, IMLE algorithm).
- Testing conducted in diverse indoor environments: an L-shaped corridor and an open-style library.
- Quantitative evaluation using Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) as a reference, assessing Root Mean Square (RMS) errors and feature detection rates.
Main Results:
- SLAMMER demonstrated the highest accuracy with RMS errors of 1.7 cm (MBR features) and 2.0 cm (interactive features).
- NAVIS and Matterport also achieved centimeter-level accuracy, with RMS errors ranging from 3.2 cm to 4.7 cm.
- All systems provided high feature detection rates (92.3%–100%), with variations influenced by point cloud density and quality.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated SLAM systems can generate centimeter-level indoor maps, suitable for various LBS applications.
- System selection should consider the trade-offs between cost, footprint, accuracy requirements, and point cloud quality.
- SLAMMER offers superior accuracy, while NAVIS and Matterport provide viable alternatives depending on specific project constraints.
Related Concept Videos
Microtubule Associated Proteins (MAPs)
Plotting of Topographic Maps
Coordinates and Map Projections
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

