Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.4K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.4K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Traumatic Memory01:20

Traumatic Memory

587
Emotionally traumatic events often lead to memories that are exceptionally vivid and enduring, sometimes persisting with remarkable clarity throughout an individual's life. A classic example of this phenomenon is a person who survives a car accident. Even years later, they may recall every detail of the event with startling accuracy — the screeching of the tires, the jarring impact, and the acrid smell of burning rubber. Such vividness contrasts sharply with how an individual...
587
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

644
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
644

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging the Military-Academic Medicine Divide: The Value, Evaluate, and Train Strategic Framework for Physician Workforce Development.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Training the Military Surgical Resident for Tomorrow's War: A Military-Unique Curriculum at the Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Can We Validate the Musculoskeletal Infection Society Criteria in Patients Suspected of Infection After Transfemoral Osseointegration Surgery?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same author

Characterization of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii</i> complex traumatic wound isolates.

Microbiology spectrum·2026
Same author

A modified Delphi consensus on tenosynovial giant cell tumour and giant cell tumour of bone : a report from the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM).

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Limitations of blood supply and walking blood bank implementation in Forward Resuscitative Surgical Detachments during large-scale combat operations: A Monte Carlo simulation model.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Murine Model of Wound Healing
05:39

Murine Model of Wound Healing

Published on: May 28, 2013

67.5K

Preclosure spectroscopic differences between healed and dehisced traumatic wounds.

Jason S Radowsky1, Romon Neely1, Jonathan A Forsberg2,3

  • 1Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (USUHS-Walter Reed Surgery), Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

Plos One
|September 28, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Three-dimensional charge-coupled device (3CCD) imaging can predict traumatic wound healing outcomes. This non-invasive method helps surgeons assess wound readiness for closure, potentially reducing complications and hospital stays.

More Related Videos

Murine Excisional Wound Healing Model and Histological Morphometric Wound Analysis
06:36

Murine Excisional Wound Healing Model and Histological Morphometric Wound Analysis

Published on: August 21, 2020

14.1K
Mongolian Gerbils as an Animal Model of Wound Healing
07:54

Mongolian Gerbils as an Animal Model of Wound Healing

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Murine Model of Wound Healing
05:39

Murine Model of Wound Healing

Published on: May 28, 2013

67.5K
Murine Excisional Wound Healing Model and Histological Morphometric Wound Analysis
06:36

Murine Excisional Wound Healing Model and Histological Morphometric Wound Analysis

Published on: August 21, 2020

14.1K
Mongolian Gerbils as an Animal Model of Wound Healing
07:54

Mongolian Gerbils as an Animal Model of Wound Healing

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Wound Healing
  • Trauma Surgery

Background:

  • Traumatic wounds require precise assessment for successful healing.
  • Current assessment methods may not fully capture wound status.
  • Three-dimensional charge-coupled device (3CCD) imaging offers a potential solution for objective wound evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of 3CCD imaging in distinguishing between traumatic wounds that heal and those that fail.
  • To correlate normalized 3CCD imaging values with wound healing outcomes.
  • To develop a predictive model for wound failure using 3CCD data.

Main Methods:

  • 119 patients with traumatic extremity wounds were screened.
  • 3CCD images were collected during debridement surgeries for 66 patients.
  • A computer application normalized 3CCD values; hierarchical cluster analysis was used for prediction.

Main Results:

  • Wound failure occurred in 20% of traumatic wounds.
  • Normalized 3CCD values differed significantly between healing and failing wounds (p ≤ 0.05).
  • A hierarchical cluster analysis model predicted wound failure with 76.6% accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • 3CCD imaging is a promising non-invasive tool for assessing traumatic wound healing potential.
  • This technology can aid surgeons in closure decisions, potentially reducing debridements and hospitalizations.
  • 3CCD imaging is cost-effective and suitable for various clinical settings, including austere environments.