Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

17:42
Preparation of Gene Gun Bullets and Biolistic Transfection of Neurons in Slice Culture
Published on: February 13, 2008
53.2K
A Worldwide Study of Bullets Fired From 10 Consecutively Rifled 9MM RUGER Pistol Barrels-Analysis of Examiner Error
James E Hamby1, David J Brundage2, Nicholas D K Petraco3,4
1International Forensic Science Laboratory & Training Centre, 410 Crosby Drive, Indianapolis, IN, 46227.
Journal of Forensic Sciences
|September 28, 2018
Summary
Forensic firearms examiners demonstrated high accuracy in matching bullets to gun barrels in a long-term study. The average examiner error rate was found to be a very low 0.053% in this firearms examination analysis.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Ballistics
- Firearms Examination
Background:
- A continuing study initiated over twenty years ago by Brundage et al. investigates the accuracy of firearms examiners.
- The research focuses on the ability to associate fired bullets with the specific barrels through which they were fired.
Purpose of the Study:
- To update and report on the results of an ongoing "10-barrel test" assessing forensic firearms examiners' proficiency.
- To quantify the error rates in bullet-barrel association by firearms examiners.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 697 participants and over 240 test sets involving bullets fired from 10 consecutively rifled RUGER P-85 pistol barrels.
- Employed a Bayesian approach to analyze the collected data.
- Assigned posterior average examiner error rates using vague prior information.
Main Results:
- The study reports on the cumulative results of this decades-long investigation.
- The most conservative value for the average examiner error rate was determined.
- A posterior mean error rate of 0.053% was calculated, with a 95% probability interval of [1.1 × 10-5 %, 0.16%].
Conclusions:
- The findings provide a statistically robust assessment of firearms examiner accuracy in bullet-barrel comparisons.
- The low calculated error rate suggests a high degree of reliability in the field of firearms examination.
- This ongoing study contributes valuable data to the understanding of forensic firearms analysis capabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error
9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error
7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Reaction Rate
64.0K
The rate of reaction is the change in the amount of a reactant or product per unit time. Reaction rates are therefore determined by measuring the time dependence of some property that can be related to reactant or product amounts. Rates of reactions that consume or produce gaseous substances, for example, are conveniently determined by measuring changes in volume or pressure.
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...
The mathematical representation of the change in the concentration of reactants and products, over time, is the rate...
64.0K
Standard Error of the Mean
12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K

