Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Partial Sciatic Nerve Ligation: A Mouse Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain to Study the Antinociceptive Effect of Novel Therapies
Published on: October 6, 2022
Neuropathic-like knee pain and associated risk factors: a cross-sectional study in a UK community sample
Gwen Sascha Fernandes1,2,3, Ana Marie Valdes1,2,3,4, David Andrew Walsh1,2,3,4
1Academic Rheumatology, Division of Rheumatology, Orthopedics and Dermatology, Nottingham City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Background:
Neuropathic-like knee pain (NKP) is often reported in individuals with knee pain (KP), but the contribution of specific central and peripheral risk factors to NKP has not been studied previously. The aims of the present study were to determine the prevalence of NKP in a community-derived sample with KP and to identify risk factors associated with NKP.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was undertaken (n = 9506) in the East Midlands community among responders (aged 40+ years) to a postal questionnaire. Questions included KP severity (numerical rating scale) and type (neuropathic versus nociceptive) using the modified painDETECT questionnaire, as well as age, body mass index (BMI), significant knee injury, widespread pain, pain catastrophising and fatigue. Multinomial regression analysis was used to determine ORs and 95% CIs. Risk factors were categorised into central and peripheral, and proportional risk contribution (PRC) and 95% CI were estimated using ROC.
Results:
KP was reported in 28.2% of responders, of whom 13.65% had NKP (i.e., 3.9% of the total population). Women reported more NKP. After adjustment for age, gender, BMI and pain severity, definite NKP showed associations (aOR, 95% CI) with fibromyalgia (4.07, 2.49-6.66), widespread pain (1.93, 1.46-2.53), nodal osteoarthritis (1.80, 1.28-2.53), injury (1.50, 1.12-2.00), pain catastrophising (5.37, 2.93-9.84) and fatigue (5.37, 3.08-9.35) compared with non-NKP participants. Although only central risk factors contributed to NKP (PRC 8%, 95% CI 2.5-12.5 for central vs. PRC 3%, 95% CI -0.25 to 7.5 for peripheral), both central and peripheral risk factors contributed equally to non-NKP (PRC 10%, 95% CI 5-20 for both).
Conclusions:
NKP appears to be driven largely by central risk factors and may require different prevention/treatment strategies.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02098070 . Registered on 27 March 2014.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...
What are Populations and Communities?

