Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

548
The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
548
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs04:01

VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs

53.2K
Effect of Lone Pairs of Electrons on Molecule Geometry
53.2K
False Memories01:18

False Memories

481
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
481
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

33.3K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
33.3K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.6K
32.6K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

414
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
414

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improved catalytic efficiency of P450 OleP for converting lithocholic acid into murideoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids through semi-rational and rational design.

Synthetic and systems biotechnology·2026
Same author

Non-targeted flavor metabolomics reveals the regulatory mechanism of LAB-yeast mixed fermentation on the flavor profile of cheese flavoring.

Food chemistry·2026
Same author

Perceptual patterns and mechanistic pathways of saltiness perception as a function of varying salt particle size.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026
Same author

Insights into the underlying mechanisms of foam instability in whipped cheese-enriched reduced-fat cream prepared from ultra-high temperature-treated emulsion.

Food chemistry·2026
Same author

Design of low loss bend waveguides with uniform width and a high-Q micro-ring resonator structure.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Update on Non- Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2026
Same journal

Furan and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in the products of Maillard reaction model systems consisting of 2'-fucosyllactose and amino acids.

Food science and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Variation in hexaconazole and indoxacarb residues in rice by washing, cooking and storage period, and risk assessment.

Food science and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Volatile organic compounds in rice wine: formation mechanisms and analytical approaches.

Food science and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive genotypic and phenotypic safety assessment of <i>Lactococcus lactis</i> subsp. <i>lactis</i> CAB701 as a probiotic candidate.

Food science and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Changes of volatiles and nonvolatiles in dried and baked Ulva prolifera, gamtae under light and in the dark storage.

Food science and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Effects of health-functional products on gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids production: an <i>ex vivo</i> and pilot human study.

Food science and biotechnology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.4K

Paired preference testing: False preferences and disruptive protocols.

Yixun Xia1, Fang Zhong1, Michael O'Mahony2

  • 11Department of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214122 China.

Food Science and Biotechnology
|September 29, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New research reveals how false preferences skew consumer testing results. Understanding brain processing helps develop new methods to eliminate bias and accurately measure product preferences.

Keywords:
cognitive subroutinesdisruptive protocolsfalse preferencespreference testsresponse bias

More Related Videos

A Conditioned Place Preference Protocol for Measuring Incubation of Craving in Rats
04:11

A Conditioned Place Preference Protocol for Measuring Incubation of Craving in Rats

Published on: November 6, 2018

17.8K
A Rapid Food-Preference Assay in Drosophila
07:13

A Rapid Food-Preference Assay in Drosophila

Published on: February 11, 2021

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
07:29

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare

Published on: February 22, 2020

7.4K
A Conditioned Place Preference Protocol for Measuring Incubation of Craving in Rats
04:11

A Conditioned Place Preference Protocol for Measuring Incubation of Craving in Rats

Published on: November 6, 2018

17.8K
A Rapid Food-Preference Assay in Drosophila
07:13

A Rapid Food-Preference Assay in Drosophila

Published on: February 11, 2021

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Sensory Science
  • Cognitive Science
  • Consumer Behavior Analysis

Background:

  • Paired preference testing is a common method to measure consumer preferences.
  • This method can be influenced by 'false preferences,' which are not based on sensory product attributes.
  • These false preferences arise from response bias, distorting actual consumer choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in preference measurement.
  • To critically examine existing paired preference testing protocols.
  • To introduce novel methods for eliminating response bias in preference testing.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing literature on preference measurement and response bias.
  • Examination of statistical approaches to address false preferences.
  • Introduction of new experimental protocols based on cognitive processing models.

Main Results:

  • Discovery of false preferences significantly impacts paired preference testing validity.
  • Response bias can be suppressed by understanding and utilizing brain processing subroutines.
  • Development of disruptive experimental protocols to mitigate bias.

Conclusions:

  • Traditional paired preference testing may not accurately predict consumer behavior due to response bias.
  • New methods offer a more reliable way to measure true consumer preferences.
  • Further research is needed to validate the predictive power of these novel protocols.