Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Responses to Gravity and Touch02:26

Responses to Gravity and Touch

41.9K
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity
41.9K
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress02:45

Responses to Heat and Cold Stress

14.8K
Every organism has an optimum temperature range within which healthy growth and physiological functioning can occur. At the ends of this range, there will be a minimum and maximum temperature that interrupt biological processes.
14.8K
Humoral Immune Responses01:36

Humoral Immune Responses

84.0K
Overview
84.0K
Responses to Drought and Flooding02:41

Responses to Drought and Flooding

12.1K
Water plays a significant role in the life cycle of plants. However, insufficient or excess of water can be detrimental and pose a serious threat to plants.
12.1K
Responses to Salt Stress02:02

Responses to Salt Stress

14.6K
Salt stress—which can be triggered by high salt concentrations in a plant’s environment—can significantly affect plant growth and crop production by influencing photosynthesis and the absorption of water and nutrients.
14.6K
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light02:00

Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light

28.5K
Light plays a significant role in regulating the growth and development of plants. In addition to providing energy for photosynthesis, light provides other important cues to regulate a range of developmental and physiological responses in plants.
28.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Closing editorial for the special issue of cortex: Neurocognitive perspectives on discourse and connected language.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

ConversationAlign: Open-source software for analyzing patterns of lexical use and alignment in conversation transcripts.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Shortened stimulus exposure time in confrontation naming in aphasia reveals temporal processing impairments: Implications for assessment and treatment of anomia.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Does genetic testing impact stigma in autism: A scoping review.

Journal of community genetics·2026
Same author

Energy-Efficient Chemical Recycling of Polyethylene Terephthalate via Water-Free Glycolysis Process Using Membrane Technology.

ChemSusChem·2026
Same author

Measuring brain sensitivity to semantic distance in spoken narrative comprehension.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
04:51

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy

Published on: April 11, 2019

10.4K

The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in

Jamie Reilly1,2, Alexandra Kelly3,4, Seung Hwan Kim5

  • 1Eleanor M. Saffran Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. reillyj@temple.edu.

Behavior Research Methods
|September 29, 2018
PubMed
Summary

The task-evoked pupillary response (TEPR) scales linearly, not nonlinearly, regardless of baseline pupil size. This finding clarifies cognitive pupillometry methods and suggests reevaluating past studies.

Keywords:
ArousalCognitive loadExecutive functioningPsychophysicsPupillometry

More Related Videos

Using Touch-evoked Response and Locomotion Assays to Assess Muscle Performance and Function in Zebrafish
09:40

Using Touch-evoked Response and Locomotion Assays to Assess Muscle Performance and Function in Zebrafish

Published on: October 31, 2016

13.6K
Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
04:51

Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy

Published on: April 11, 2019

10.4K
Using Touch-evoked Response and Locomotion Assays to Assess Muscle Performance and Function in Zebrafish
09:40

Using Touch-evoked Response and Locomotion Assays to Assess Muscle Performance and Function in Zebrafish

Published on: October 31, 2016

13.6K
Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs
09:25

Pupillometry to Assess Auditory Sensation in Guinea Pigs

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • The task-evoked pupillary response (TEPR) is a sensitive physiological measure of cognitive load.
  • Accurate TEPR measurement requires correcting for baseline pupil diameter variability.
  • Current baseline correction methods in pupillometry yield disparate results, creating a methodological paradox.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To resolve the debate on whether the human TEPR scales linearly or nonlinearly with baseline pupil size.
  • To determine the appropriate mathematical model for TEPR baseline correction.

Main Methods:

  • Manipulated baseline pupil size by altering room illuminance (dark, mid, bright).
  • Presented participants with auditory (pure-tone transitions) and visual (word lists) stimuli.
  • Measured phasic pupillary responses under controlled lighting and task conditions.

Main Results:

  • Phasic pupillary responses consistently scaled linearly across all tested lighting and task conditions.
  • The TEPR amplitude was demonstrated to be independent of baseline pupil size.
  • Evidence supports a linear scaling model for the human TEPR.

Conclusions:

  • The human TEPR exhibits linear scaling, independent of baseline pupil diameter.
  • This finding necessitates a reevaluation of established pupillometry methodologies and past study interpretations.
  • Standardizing baseline correction in cognitive pupillometry is crucial for reliable results.