The fixation-related lambda response: Effects of saccade magnitude, spatial frequency, and ocular artifact removal
Anthony J Ries1, David Slayback2, Jon Touryan2
1Human Research and Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, Proving Ground, MD 21005, United States of America; Department of Behavioral Sciences & Leadership, Warfighter Effectiveness Research Center (WERC), U.S. Air Force Academy, CO 80840, United States of America.
Abstract:
Fixation-related potentials (FRPs) enable examination of electrophysiological signatures of visual perception under naturalistic conditions, providing a neural snapshot of the fixated scene. The most prominent FRP component, commonly referred to as the lambda response, is a large deflection over occipital electrodes (O1, Oz, O2) peaking 80-100 ms post fixation, reflecting afferent input to visual cortex. The lambda response is affected by bottom-up stimulus features and the size of the preceding saccade; however, prior research has not adequately controlled for these influences in free viewing paradigms. The current experiment (N = 16, 1 female) addresses these concerns by systematically manipulating spatial frequency in a free-viewing task requiring a range of saccade sizes. Given the close temporal proximity between saccade related activity and the onset of the lambda response, we evaluate how removing independent components (IC) associated with ocular motion artifacts affects lambda response amplitude. Our results indicate that removing ocular artifact ICs based on the covariance with gaze position did not significantly affect the amplitude of this occipital potential. Moreover, the results showed that spatial frequency and saccade magnitude each produce significant effects on lambda amplitude, where amplitude decreased with increasing spatial frequency and increased as a function of saccade size for small and medium-sized saccades. The amplitude differences between spatial frequencies were maintained across all saccade magnitudes suggesting these effects are produced from distinctly different and uncorrelated mechanisms. The current results will inform future analyses of the lambda potential in natural scenes where saccade magnitudes and spatial frequencies ultimately vary.
More Related Videos
06:12Recording Horizontal Saccade Performances Accurately in Neurological Patients Using Electro-oculogram
Published on: March 13, 2018
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Frequency Response of BJT
Low-Frequency Response: At low frequencies, the behavior of the BJT is determined by its DC bias point, which is set by the...
Frequency Response of a Circuit
The transfer function is pivotal in characterizing how these circuits react to various frequencies, facilitating a profound understanding of their behavior. An essential parameter is the time constant, signifying the...
Orders of Magnitude
The order of magnitude is simply a way of rounding numbers consistently to the nearest power of 10. This makes doing rough mental math...
Frequency Response of Op Amp Circuits
Frequency Response and Gain:
The gain of the op-amp, A(ω), is not a constant but a function of the input signal frequency. An op-amp can maintain a constant gain at low frequencies, known...
Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
Frequency-dependent Selection
