Mid-axillary pacemaker re-implantation after contralateral pocket infection in an emaciated elderly case

The number of implantations of cardiac implantable electrophysiological devices (CIEDs) has increased over the past several years. However, the aging population and expansion of indications for CIEDs have led to an increase in associated infections. We experienced a case of a 99-year-old man presenting with skin erosion at the pocket site, where a 6-month-old implantable pacemaker was replaced. He was referred for pacemaker pocket infection and presented with fever accompanied by pain and swelling around pacemaker generator. We could not explant 7-year-old pacemaker leads and the patient refused to undergo either laser lead extraction or surgical removal. We planned to re-implant in the contralateral chest. However, the patient was emaciated with low body-mass-index (15.2 kg/m²), thus concerns arose about the possibility of tissue disruption and re-infection owing to thin skin and absence of sufficient subcutaneous tissue in contralateral subclavian region. Axillary placement of CIEDs has been adopted in patients with limited venous access. We applied a mid-axillary pacemaker implant procedure to this elderly and emaciated patient. Postoperative clinical course was uneventful. After discharge, no history of unexplained fever or illness was recorded. Mid-axillary pacemaker pocket could be an alternative approach for re-implantation in patients with emaciated, cachexic, or limited pocket preparation. <Learning objective: We apply the mid-axillary pacemaker implant procedure to a nonagenarian with contralateral pacemaker infection to minimize the risk of skin disruption after implantation. This implies that implantation is possible in patients with emaciated or cachexic or infection of the contralateral subclavian pocket. Mid-axillary pacemaker pocket could be an alternative approach for re-implantation in patients with emaciated, cachexic, or limited pocket preparation.> .