Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships
Published on: April 20, 2022
Preschoolers Favor Their Ingroup When Resources Are Limited
Kristy Jia Jin Lee1, Gianluca Esposito1,2, Peipei Setoh1
1Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Insights
Preschoolers prioritize fairness in resource distribution, but favor their ingroup when resources are limited. This study explores fairness and ingroup loyalty in young children.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Understanding the development of social preferences in young children is crucial.
- Fairness and ingroup loyalty are key social concepts that emerge early in development.
- Preschoolers' resource distribution strategies reveal insights into their moral and social reasoning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how 2- to 4-year-old preschoolers balance fairness and ingroup loyalty in resource distribution.
- To determine the conditions under which fairness or ingroup favoritism takes precedence.
- To examine the developmental stability of fairness and ingroup loyalty knowledge.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments involving 202 preschoolers in Singapore.
- Children distributed pairs of toys between two puppets (one ingroup, one outgroup).
- Resource availability was manipulated (equal vs. limited resources).
Main Results:
- Children predominantly used an equality rule for fair distribution when resources were sufficient.
- Children showed ingroup favoritism when resource availability was limited.
- Fairness generally superseded ingroup loyalty, except under conditions of scarcity.
Conclusions:
- Preschoolers' resource distribution is influenced by both fairness principles and social group membership.
- Limited resource availability is a critical factor that can shift children's distributive strategies towards ingroup loyalty.
- Findings suggest a stable development from understanding to behavioral enactment of fairness and ingroup loyalty.
Abstract:
The present study examined how 2- to 4-year-old preschoolers in Singapore (N = 202) balance fairness and ingroup loyalty in resource distribution. Specifically, we investigated whether children would enact fair distributions as defined by an equality rule, or show partiality toward their ingroup when distributing resources, and the conditions under which one distributive strategy may take precedence over the other. In Experiment 1, children distributed four different pairs of toys between two puppets. In the Group condition, one puppet was assigned to the same group as the child while the other puppet was assigned to a different group using colored stickers in the No Group condition, no group assignments were made. Children's distributions were assessed for whether the toys were fairly (equally) distributed or unfairly (unequally) distributed in favor of either puppet. Experiment 2 was identical to the Group condition in Experiment 1, except that a third identical toy was introduced following the distribution of each toy pair. Distributions were separately assessed for whether the first two toys were fairly (equally) distributed or unfairly (unequally) distributed in favor of either puppet, and whether children distributed the third toy to the ingroup or outgroup puppet. Overall, the vast majority of children abided by an equality rule when resources were precisely enough to be shared between recipients, but distributed favorably to the ingroup member when there was limited resource availability. We found that fairness trumped ingroup loyalty except in resource distribution involving limited resources. Our results are consistent with findings from other resource distribution studies with preschoolers and similar studies measuring young infants' expectations of distributive behaviors in third-party observations. Taken together, there is evidence suggesting stability in the development of knowledge to behavior in the subdomains of fairness and ingroup loyalty.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Limiting Reactant
The Number e as a Limit
Types of Limits I
Limit Laws I

