Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026
Non-Invasive Modulation and Robotic Mapping of Motor Cortex in the Developing Brain
Published on: July 1, 2019
Intervention-Induced Motor Cortex Plasticity in Hemiparetic Children With Perinatal Stroke
Hsing-Ching Kuo1,2,3, Ephrem Zewdie1,2,3, Patrick Ciechanski1,2
11 Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Background:
Clinical trials are suggesting efficacy of intensive therapy combined with brain stimulation to improve hand function in hemiparetic children with perinatal stroke. However, individual variability exists and the underlying neuroplasticity mechanisms are unknown. Exploring primary motor cortex (M1) neurophysiology, and how it changes with such interventions, may provide valuable biomarkers for advancing personalized neurorehabilitation.
Methods:
Forty-five children (age 6-19 years) with hemiparesis participated in PLASTIC CHAMPS, a blinded, sham-controlled, factorial clinical trial. All received 80 hours of goal-directed intensive upper extremity therapy. They were randomized into 4 groups: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of contralesional M1, constraint therapy, both, or neither. Stimulus recruitment curves (SRC), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) for lesioned and contralesional M1 were investigated using TMS. Clinical assessments including the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) were conducted pre- and postintervention.
Results:
All children completed the intervention and both function (AHA) and goal performance (COPM) improved with additive effects of rTMS and constraint ( P < .01). After intervention, motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes from the contralesional M1 to the less-affected hand increased (n = 16, P < .02). SRC from the contralesional M1 to the less-affected hand increased (n = 25, P < .01). SICI of the contralesional M1 to the less-affected hand decreased (n = 30, P < .04). No changes were observed for ICF in either hemisphere ( P > .12).
Conclusion:
TMS applied before/after intensive neuromodulation therapies can explore M1 neurophysiology and plasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Increased MEP sizes and decreased SICI may reflect mechanisms of interventional plasticity and be potential biomarkers of individualized medicine.
More Related Videos
09:42Author Spotlight: Using Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface to Improve Motor and Cognitive Function in Stroke Patients
Published on: September 1, 2023
08:01Compensatory Limb Use and Behavioral Assessment of Motor Skill Learning Following Sensorimotor Cortex Injury in a Mouse Model of Ischemic Stroke
Published on: July 10, 2014
Related Concept Videos
01:14Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
01:23Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex
00:58Plasticity
01:31Plasticizers
Plasticizers function by using surface-active agents to create repulsive electrostatic forces between cement particles. This dispersion enhances the concrete's...
01:03Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
01:21Plastic Behavior